2020
DOI: 10.1109/taffc.2018.2878029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Temporal Features of Observers’ Physiological Measures to Distinguish Between Genuine and Fake Smiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following previous research into physiological signal analysis [ 23 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ], we extracted 29 features from each emotion sample, which include 15 time-domain features, 13 frequency-domain features and 1 nonlinear feature. Table 1 lists details of these extracted features.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following previous research into physiological signal analysis [ 23 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ], we extracted 29 features from each emotion sample, which include 15 time-domain features, 13 frequency-domain features and 1 nonlinear feature. Table 1 lists details of these extracted features.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People often fabricate smiles in everyday lives ( Ekman et al, 1988 ). Previous studies show that these can be distinguished from spontaneous smiles by differences in muscle patterns involved in the production of facial expressions ( Ekman and Friesen, 1982 ; Ekman et al, 1988 ; Ekman, 1993 ; Kanade et al, 2000 ; Schmidt et al, 2006 ; Krumhuber and Manstead, 2009 ; Hossain et al, 2020 ). In a spontaneous smile, the zygomatic major pulls the mouth corner upwards and the orbicularis oculi raises the cheek and so produces certain features, which can include a raised upper lip, stretched mouth, and displayed teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we explore the effects of four different physiological signals, Electrodermal Activity (EDA), Blood Volume Pulse (BVP), Skin Temperature (ST) and Pupil Dilation (PD) from subjects listening to music. All of these signals showed significant changes (reflecting the listener's reaction) to different stimuli [13,14,15]. Our previous study [16] had only explored the effects of EDA signals in differentiating different types of music based on genre and participants' subjective ratings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%