Executive summary BackgroundChronic diseases are increasing worldwide and have become a significant burden to those affected by those diseases. Disease-specific education programs have demonstrated improved outcomes, although people do forget information quickly or memorize it incorrectly. The teach-back method was introduced in an attempt to reinforce education to patients. To date, the evidence regarding the effectiveness of health education employing the teach-back method in improved care has not yet been reviewed systematically.
ObjectivesThis systematic review examined the evidence on using the teach-back method in health education JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports . 2 programs for improving adherence and self-management of people with chronic disease.
Types of participantsAdults aged 18 years and over with one or more than one chronic disease.
Types of interventionAll types of interventions which included the teach-back method in an education program for people with chronic diseases. The comparator was chronic disease education programs that did not involve the teachback method.
Types of studiesRandomized and non-randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, before-after studies and case-control studies.
Types of outcomesThe outcomes of interest were adherence, self-management, disease-specific knowledge, readmission, knowledge retention, self-efficacy and quality of life.
Search strategySearches were conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source, and Google Scholar databases. Search terms were combined by AND or OR in search strings. Reference lists of included articles were also searched for further potential references.
Methodological qualityTwo reviewers conducted quality appraisal of papers using the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument.
Data collectionData were extracted using the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument data extraction instruments.
Data synthesisThere was significant heterogeneity in selected studies, hence a meta-analysis was not possible and the results were presented in narrative form.
ResultsOf the 21 articles retrieved in full, 12 on the use of the teach-back method met the inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. Four studies confirmed improved disease-specific knowledge in intervention participants. One study showed a statistically significant improvement in adherence to medication and diet among type 2 diabetics patients in the intervention group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Two studies found statistically significant improvements in self-efficacy (p = 0.0026 and p < 0.001) in the intervention groups. One study examined quality of life in heart failure patients but the results did not JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports 3 improve from the intervention (p = 0.59). Five studies found a reduction in readmission rates and hospitalization but the...