2021
DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1678
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using target sequence capture to improve the phylogenetic resolution of a rapid radiation in New Zealand Veronica

Abstract: Recent, rapid species radiations present rich opportunities for improving our understanding of the mechanisms involved in lineage diversification (Abe and Lieberman, 2009;Drummond et al., 2012;Hughes and Atchison, 2015). However, rapid radiations also present a challenge for phylogenetics. Fast successive speciation events often lead to low sequence divergence and poorly resolved relationships with traditional phylogenetic markers, which are typically slow-evolving plastid or nuclear ribosomal (nrDNA) genes (N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S2 – S7). The low number of informative genes coupled with coalescence and concordance analyses suggest that incomplete lineage sorting (likely due to rapid radiations) along the backbone of the group as indicated by short branch lengths, may have played a significant role in the group’s evolutionary history, a common theme in modern-day phylogenomic studies (Morales-Briones et al, 2021; Stubbs et al, 2020; Thomas et al, 2021). Our analyses also hint that historical hybridization may be contributing to further phylogenetic discordance within the group, particularly within a subclade of Ledebouria Clade A (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S2 – S7). The low number of informative genes coupled with coalescence and concordance analyses suggest that incomplete lineage sorting (likely due to rapid radiations) along the backbone of the group as indicated by short branch lengths, may have played a significant role in the group’s evolutionary history, a common theme in modern-day phylogenomic studies (Morales-Briones et al, 2021; Stubbs et al, 2020; Thomas et al, 2021). Our analyses also hint that historical hybridization may be contributing to further phylogenetic discordance within the group, particularly within a subclade of Ledebouria Clade A (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larridon et al ( 2020 ) also compared results obtained with Cyperaceae‐specific baits and found that they were not better at resolving relationships than those acquired with the Angiosperms353 probe set, thus indicating that use of the Angiosperms353 probe set can be as productive a method without the time and cost associated with the development of taxon‐specific baits. Similarly, Thomas et al ( 2021a ) used both introns and exons from the Angiosperms353 probe set to better resolve phylogenetic relationships in Veronica sect. Hebe (Plantaginaceae), a radiation estimated at 5–10 million years ago.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While phylogenomic datasets show great promise to resolve relationships in previously intractable angiosperm lineages, the irony is that many of these groups have undergone rapid radiations ( Larson et al, 2020 ; Shee et al, 2020 ; Rose et al, 2021 ; Thomas et al, 2021 ), which increases the chance of gene tree heterogeneity due to ILS ( Pamilo and Nei, 1988 ; Maddison, 1997 ; Oliver, 2013 ). Rampant gene tree discordance need not mean that species trees are poorly supported, provided that the discordance is consistent with the underlying model used to generate the species tree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%