2011
DOI: 10.1109/te.2011.2105873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Tablet PCs and Interactive Software in IC Design Courses to Improve Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Derting and Cox (2008) showed an increase in grades within a portion of the class that was exposed to laptop computers; unfortunately the computer use in their study largely occurred on the part of the faculty member, making comparisons with our study difficult due to the difference in methodology. In a study with similar laptop computer usage as in our study, students in engineering classes saw some gains in academic performance but they were not statistically significant, nor were there consistent gains across all tasks (Simoni 2011). The findings of Simoni (2011) are consistent with our study and with the fact that while students felt that laptop computers were important to their academic success, in actuality there were no significant gains in grades during the semester.…”
Section: Student Performancesupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Derting and Cox (2008) showed an increase in grades within a portion of the class that was exposed to laptop computers; unfortunately the computer use in their study largely occurred on the part of the faculty member, making comparisons with our study difficult due to the difference in methodology. In a study with similar laptop computer usage as in our study, students in engineering classes saw some gains in academic performance but they were not statistically significant, nor were there consistent gains across all tasks (Simoni 2011). The findings of Simoni (2011) are consistent with our study and with the fact that while students felt that laptop computers were important to their academic success, in actuality there were no significant gains in grades during the semester.…”
Section: Student Performancesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In a study with similar laptop computer usage as in our study, students in engineering classes saw some gains in academic performance but they were not statistically significant, nor were there consistent gains across all tasks (Simoni 2011). The findings of Simoni (2011) are consistent with our study and with the fact that while students felt that laptop computers were important to their academic success, in actuality there were no significant gains in grades during the semester.…”
Section: Student Performancesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The mean score for the ESCE students were higher (81.72) than the traditional students (78.26) however the standard deviation shows a greater dispersal for the final test scores of traditional students (12.69) as opposed to ESCE students (9.28). 12 This suggests that the ESCE method is more helpful to average and better students than to exceptional students, even as the modal group for the final scores for either traditional or the ESCE program was the 80–90 range. However, only 35.2% of the traditional students are found in the 80–90 range as compared to 53.7% of ESCE students in the 80–90 range.…”
Section: Assessment Of Escs Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active learning takes the student from the traditional passive position and offers more possibilities for engagement. Several studies provide evidence of the positive correlation between increased students engagement and their increased school performance and their retention of content in contrast to passive reception (Smith et al, 2005), (Simoni, 2011). The use of tablets in a classroom increases the level of student engagement (Shishah et al, 2013).…”
Section: Low Student Performancementioning
confidence: 99%