Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2701126.2701130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using supervised learning to classify authentic and fake online reviews

Abstract: Before making a purchase, users are increasingly inclined to browse online reviews that are posted to share post-purchase experiences of products and services. However, not all reviews are necessarily authentic. Some entries could be fake yet written to appear authentic. Conceivably, authentic and fake reviews are not easy to differentiate. Hence, this paper uses supervised learning algorithms to analyze the extent to which authentic and fake reviews could be distinguished based on four linguistic clues, namel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(84 reference statements)
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the detection of fake reviews based only on textual features is challenging. Other articles propose additional textual features such as semantic similarity and emotion [37], a wide variety of lexical and syntactic features [14] and deeper details such as understandability, level of details, writing style and cognition indicators [3].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the detection of fake reviews based only on textual features is challenging. Other articles propose additional textual features such as semantic similarity and emotion [37], a wide variety of lexical and syntactic features [14] and deeper details such as understandability, level of details, writing style and cognition indicators [3].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time horizon analyzed was from 10-17 June 2019, allowing the download of a total of n = 10,786 tweets under the search term #Education. Following Sherman et al [39] and Banerjee et al [40], we used a randomized controlled process to select this term by focusing on the education sector and the proposed research questions. This process allows researchers to systematically select a sample based on the social media content-in this study, in the form of tweets with a specific hashtag.…”
Section: Data Sampling Extraction and Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, after connecting to the public Twitter API to collect the data, we downloaded a total of 21,061 tweets that contained the hashtag #DigitalMarketing. Following Sherman et al [43] and Banerjee et al [44], we used a randomized controlled process to select this search term.…”
Section: Data Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%