2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0732-3123(01)00064-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using students' statistical thinking to inform instruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results displayed that the failures, which the students made in the calculations for some probability problems included in the study (especially for the eighth problem of the study), made us conclude that they had difficulties in fractions, percentage calculations and four arithmetical operations with numbers. This overlaps the results obtained in the studies made by Jones et al (1996), and Sezgin-Memnun, Altun, and Yilmaz (2010) that the students had difficulty, especially in understanding and using the concept of sample space. It is also similar to the results obtained by Tunc (2006), and Bar-On and Or-Bach (1988) where the students had insufficient knowledge and skills regarding the subject of sets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The results displayed that the failures, which the students made in the calculations for some probability problems included in the study (especially for the eighth problem of the study), made us conclude that they had difficulties in fractions, percentage calculations and four arithmetical operations with numbers. This overlaps the results obtained in the studies made by Jones et al (1996), and Sezgin-Memnun, Altun, and Yilmaz (2010) that the students had difficulty, especially in understanding and using the concept of sample space. It is also similar to the results obtained by Tunc (2006), and Bar-On and Or-Bach (1988) where the students had insufficient knowledge and skills regarding the subject of sets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The characteristics within each of the levels of development provide guidance for the design of instructional activities and the selection of instructional strategies that will capitalize on where students are in their reasoning in this sequence of development. Results of this study provide evidence that instruction can influence the learning of probability (Jones et al 1999). …”
Section: Extending To Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Jones et al (1997Jones et al ( , 1999 evaluated the thinking of 3rd-grade students in an educational setting to create a "Probabilistic Thinking Framework," which describes the levels of reasoning stages related to key constructs (sample space, probability of an event, probability comparisons, and conditional probability). It is interesting to note that these key constructs maintain a striking resemblance to the four cognitive demands made on children when learning probability.…”
Section: Extending To Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypothetical learning trajectories have been described for a number of teaching experiments in diverse areas, such as linear measurement, equivalence of fractions, and statistics (cf. Gravemeijer, 2004;Jones et al, 2001;Simon & Tzur, 2004;Stephan, Bowers, Cobb, & Gravemeijer, 2003).…”
Section: Susan D Nickerson and Ian Whitacrementioning
confidence: 99%