Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1177/0142723719846583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using strategic pauses during shared reading with preschoolers: Time for prediction is better than time for reflection when learning new words

Abstract: Preschoolers can learn vocabulary through shared book reading, especially when given the opportunity to predict and/or reflect on the novel words encountered in the story. Readers often pause and encourage children to guess or repeat novel words during shared reading, and prior research has suggested a positive correlation between how much readers dramatically pause and how well words are later retained. This experimental study of 60 3- to 5-year-olds compared the effects of placing pauses before target words … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Across the sample of children in this study, there was evidence that participants remembered many of the monster names that they had been exposed to in the books they heard read aloud. Children’s identification scores ( M = 6.97, SD = 1.40) were significantly greater than chance (4.00), t (29) = 11.60, p < .001, d = 2.12, and children’s production scores ( M = 3.00, SD = 2.12) were anecdotally higher than in other comparison studies testing children’s recall of these same monster names (Read, 2014; Read et al, 2019), and were also significantly greater than 0, t (29) = 7.75, p < .001, d = 1.41.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Across the sample of children in this study, there was evidence that participants remembered many of the monster names that they had been exposed to in the books they heard read aloud. Children’s identification scores ( M = 6.97, SD = 1.40) were significantly greater than chance (4.00), t (29) = 11.60, p < .001, d = 2.12, and children’s production scores ( M = 3.00, SD = 2.12) were anecdotally higher than in other comparison studies testing children’s recall of these same monster names (Read, 2014; Read et al, 2019), and were also significantly greater than 0, t (29) = 7.75, p < .001, d = 1.41.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The storybooks used in this study were developed and used in previous studies of the impact of rhyme on new vocabulary learning (Read, 2014; Read et al, 2019). The full text and illustrations of each storybook version can be viewed in the Open Science Framework (OSF) project link: https://osf.io/eqn73/?view_only=80543879c1c84b5c886bcadd27ab2862.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations