2004
DOI: 10.1177/1052562904264380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Stories to Reframe the Social Construction of Reality: A Trio of Activities

Abstract: This article first presents the theoretical grounding for both storytelling and the social construction of reality. A sequence of classroom-tested tools for combining stories with reality construction is then described. Two tools for framing reality are offered: One is an actual frame that students take out of the classroom to frame a scene in different ways; the other requires students to frame two different segments of a photographic advertisement. In both exercises, students tell (either orally or in writin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, because we understand society in terms of both objective and subjective reality, television becomes an agent in our social construction of reality (Berger & Luckman, 1966). According to Morgan and Dennehy (2004), ''people see so-called objective reality through the lens of their own background, attitudes, values, beliefs, biases, heuristics, and stereotypes'' (p. 375). The question then becomes how and what types of discourse most influence the various objects in ''reality,'' such as views of gender, interpersonal interactions, and other social norms (see Allen & Waks, 1990;Mantcheva Sternadori, 2007, for social construction of reality and women's roles).…”
Section: Explaining Media Influence On Individual Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, because we understand society in terms of both objective and subjective reality, television becomes an agent in our social construction of reality (Berger & Luckman, 1966). According to Morgan and Dennehy (2004), ''people see so-called objective reality through the lens of their own background, attitudes, values, beliefs, biases, heuristics, and stereotypes'' (p. 375). The question then becomes how and what types of discourse most influence the various objects in ''reality,'' such as views of gender, interpersonal interactions, and other social norms (see Allen & Waks, 1990;Mantcheva Sternadori, 2007, for social construction of reality and women's roles).…”
Section: Explaining Media Influence On Individual Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a number of authors have concentrated how to use more open ended and emerging narratives in the management education context (e.g. Down and King, 1999;Gold and Holman, 2001;Morgan and Dennehy, 2004). It is within this emerging tradition that we position our proposed educational method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facilitating reflexive skills and critical thinking through sharing and deconstructing life stories means that there is a privileging of context and community rather than the more individualistic approaches of Western society; more attention is paid to the rich contributions of indigenous knowledge systems through personal storytelling; and the voices of students become part of the co-construction of knowledge. Stories are also viewed more practically in education as ideal vehicles for students to make learning meaningful, to retain concepts, to make better sense out of their observations, and to develop multiple perspectives rather than being stuck in the belief that their own views are the only and correct ones (Morgan and Dennehy 2004).…”
Section: Narrative Reflexivity In Education and Health Promotionmentioning
confidence: 99%