Using standardized sampling designs from population ecology to assess biodiversity patterns of therophyte vegetation across scales

Abstract

Aim The analysis of diversity across multiple scales is hampered by methodological difficulties resulting from the use of different sampling methods at different scales and by the application of different definitions of the communities to be sampled at different scales. It is our aim to analyse diversity in a nested hierarchy of scales by applying a formalized sampling concept used in population ecology when analysing population structure. This concept involved a precise definition of the sampled vegetation type by the presence of a target species, in our case Hornungia petraea. We compared separate indices of inventory diversity (i.e. number of species) and differentiation diversity (i.e. extent of change in species composition or dissimilarity) with indices derived from species accumulation curves and related diversity patterns to topographical plot characteristics such as area and distance.Location Ten plots were established systematically over a distance of 100 km each in the distribution centre of H. petraea in Italy (i.e. Marche and Umbria) and in a peripheral exclave in Germany (i.e. Thuringia and Saxony-Anhalt).Methods We used a nested sampling design of 10 random subplots within plots and 10 systematically placed plots within regions. Internal a-diversity (species richness) and internal b-diversity (dissimilarity) were calculated on the basis of subplots, a-, band c-diversity on the basis of plots in Italy and Germany. In addition, indices of inventory diversity and differentiation diversity were derived by fitting species accumulation curves to the Michaelis-Menten equation.Results There was no significant difference in the internal a-diversity between German and Italian plots but the aand c-diversity were higher in Italy than in Germany. In Germany, the internal b-diversity and b-diversity were lower than in Italy. The differentiation diversity increased with increasing scale from subplots over plots to regions. The same results were obtained by calculating species accumulation curves. Significant positive correlations were encountered between the internal a-diversity and a-diversity in both countries, while the internal b-diversity and internal a-diversity showed a correlation only for the Italian plots. Similarity decay was found for German plots with respect to inter-plot distance and for Italian plots with respect to altitudinal difference and to a smaller degree to distance between plots. Main conclusionsThe design chosen and the consistent analysis of species accumulation curves by the Michaelis-Menten equation yielded consistent results over different scales. The specific therophyte vegetation type in this study reflected diversity patterns also observed in other studies, e.g. a greater differentiation diversity in central than in peripheral habitats and a trend of increasing species richness towards lower altitudes. No asymptotic saturation of species richness between different scales was observed. Indications were found

Spatial Patterns of Phytodiversity - Assessing Vegetation Using (Dis) Similarity Measures

“…It is well established and extensively used especially in vegetation ecology (e.g. Condit et al, 2002;Kluth & Bruelheide, 2004). This guarantees comparability with other studies.…”

“…However, even though Legendre et al, (2005) postulate that "beta diversity is a key concept for understanding the functioning of ecosystems, for the conservation of biodiversity, and for ecosystem management", implementation is still scarce compared to measures of species richness, alpha-diversity and its derivates (but see e.g. Condit et al, 2002;Kluth and Bruelheide, 2004;Pitkänen 2000). However, the term 'beta-diversity' is not very clear and has multiple meanings (e.g.…”

Inventory, differentiation, and proportional diversity: a consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity

“…Beta diversity is frequently used in a very general sense of differentiation between units (e.g., Condit et al 2002;Koleff et al 2003b;Chave 2004;Kluth and Bruelheide 2004;Chust et al 2006;Olden and Rooney 2006). Vellend (2001) tried to clarify terminology by distinguishing between beta diversity (relationship between the species richness or representatives of species richness at different scale levels) and ''species turnover'' (compositional similarity).…”

Growth parameters of endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera laevis, Unionoida)

“…The hyperbolic saturation function, or Michaelis-Menten equation, is commonly used by ecologists (Li 1983, Kluth & Bruelheide 2004). San Miguel et al (2004 modifi ed this function by adding two parameters to apply the function to a mussel population after a certain age.…”