2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.avrs.2022.100007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using stable isotope to compare the habitat use and trophic level between the new and old breeding range of wild Crested Ibis in the early breeding season

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most Lepidoptera found were small butterflies, moths, or larvae. It has been found that the stable isotope values of animals increase as size increases [19], and the small number of lepidopteran individuals consumed may explain their low contribution rate in the stable isotope analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most Lepidoptera found were small butterflies, moths, or larvae. It has been found that the stable isotope values of animals increase as size increases [19], and the small number of lepidopteran individuals consumed may explain their low contribution rate in the stable isotope analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In birds, trophic niche studies usually use direct observation [17] and gastrointestinal content analysis [18]; these methods require substantial time and manpower, conflict with non-invasive studies of endangered wildlife, and can only identify a small percentage of food resources [4,19]. Compared to traditional methods, stable isotope analysis overcomes these limitations to evaluate the dietary composition of consumers using tissue synthesis based on the metabolic activity on different time scales [19,20]. In birds, feathers remain metabolically inert, and keratin in feathers stops isotope fractionation; because of this, the isotopic information recorded in feather tissue reflects the dietary composition during molting the previous year [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%