Interspeech 2012 2012
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2012-40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using spectral measures to differentiate Mandarin and Korean sibilant fricatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All speech sound contrasts make use of multiple co-varying phonetic dimensions. The sounds examined here, Mandarin sibilants, have been described as differing in spectral mean or center of gravity, kurtosis, spectral peak, and second formant of the following vowel, to name only a few (Kallay & Holliday, 2012;Lee-Kim, 2011). While speakers and listeners make use of many phonetic dimensions in contrast realization, dimensions differ in their relative strength.…”
Section: Individual Differences In Production Cue Weightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All speech sound contrasts make use of multiple co-varying phonetic dimensions. The sounds examined here, Mandarin sibilants, have been described as differing in spectral mean or center of gravity, kurtosis, spectral peak, and second formant of the following vowel, to name only a few (Kallay & Holliday, 2012;Lee-Kim, 2011). While speakers and listeners make use of many phonetic dimensions in contrast realization, dimensions differ in their relative strength.…”
Section: Individual Differences In Production Cue Weightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic studies of standardized Mandarin have often characterized the sibilants as exhibiting a three-way distinction in spectral center of gravity (COG; also sometimes referred to as spectral mean or the first spectral moment, M1). [ʂ] typically exhibits the lowest COG and [s] the highest, as COG is negatively correlated with length of the front cavity (Kallay & Holliday, 2012;Lee, 1999;Lee-Kim, 2011). COG has been shown to be influenced by coarticulation with following vowels, such that COG is lower when followed by a rounded vowel (Jeng, 2006;Y.…”
Section: Choice Of Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation