2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45641-6_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Sparse Interpolation in Hensel Lifting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, for 𝑓 in Figure 1, 𝑏 = 16. The first monomial π‘₯𝑦 3 𝑧 of degree 𝑑 = 5 is encoded as 5 β€’ 2 48 + 1 β€’ 2 32 + 3 β€’ 2 16 + 1. This is depicted as 5131 in Figure 1.…”
Section: Maple's Data Representation For Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, for 𝑓 in Figure 1, 𝑏 = 16. The first monomial π‘₯𝑦 3 𝑧 of degree 𝑑 = 5 is encoded as 5 β€’ 2 48 + 1 β€’ 2 32 + 3 β€’ 2 16 + 1. This is depicted as 5131 in Figure 1.…”
Section: Maple's Data Representation For Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the time for gcd is slower than factor then something is wrong as we could simply use the factorization of 𝐴 and 𝐡 to determine the gcd 𝐺. The factor code Maple has been using since Maple2019 is the work of Monagan and Tuncer [16,17,18]. As the reader can see Maple's factor command is faster than our GCD1 timings when #𝐺 ≫ # Δ€.…”
Section: Timing Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation