2020
DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0110230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Social Network Analysis to Understand Public Discussions: The Case Study of #SaudiWomenCanDrive on Twitter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification of the cohesive groups of people in the discussion is an extension to our previous work [47], where identification of the critical people in a discussion is studied.…”
Section: A Cohesive Groups Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The identification of the cohesive groups of people in the discussion is an extension to our previous work [47], where identification of the critical people in a discussion is studied.…”
Section: A Cohesive Groups Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the value of p=0.85 for PageRank, as widely used in the literature. Within the course of the investigation, the initial information set is converted into four networks: Mention-Network, Co-Mention-Network, Hashtag-Network, and Retweet-Network, interested readers can find the minutiae in our earlier work [47]. The substance of these networks complies involving network science for succeeding analysis and formulation.…”
Section: B Network Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%