1999
DOI: 10.1080/10437797.1999.10778981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Single System Design for Student Self-Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second type places a greater emphasis on detailed descriptions of the rubrics, explanations of abstract terms, and typical examples of performance standards (see Appendix C for an example of each type). Although "rubrics/criterion-referenced" criteria have shown stronger correlations with external measures than standard criteria (e.g., Garcia & Floyd, 1999), the size of the difference has not yet been investigated in a meta-analysis.…”
Section: Presence and Form Of The Sa Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second type places a greater emphasis on detailed descriptions of the rubrics, explanations of abstract terms, and typical examples of performance standards (see Appendix C for an example of each type). Although "rubrics/criterion-referenced" criteria have shown stronger correlations with external measures than standard criteria (e.g., Garcia & Floyd, 1999), the size of the difference has not yet been investigated in a meta-analysis.…”
Section: Presence and Form Of The Sa Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%