2023
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.23537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using session recordings to understand the content of community‐based treatment for childhood anxiety disorders and response to technology‐based training

Abstract: ObjectiveThe goal of the current study is to advance efforts to increase the quality of care for childhood anxiety disorder (CADs) through (1) detailing the content of community‐based treatment sessions, (2) exploring the validity of therapist surveys, (3) examining the influence of setting differences, and (4) testing the effects of a technology‐based training on use of nonexposure strategies.MethodsThirteen therapists were randomly assigned to technology‐based training in the use of exposure therapy or treat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
(122 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As recommended by systematic review guidelines (Page et al, 2021 ), the methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated, and the MMAT was selected to account for a range of study designs. Some study designs did not neatly fit those prescribed in the MMAT (e.g., Whiteside et al, 2023 ) and were categorised based on their dominant features. This may have resulted in the quality appraisal missing important aspects of the designs of some included studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recommended by systematic review guidelines (Page et al, 2021 ), the methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated, and the MMAT was selected to account for a range of study designs. Some study designs did not neatly fit those prescribed in the MMAT (e.g., Whiteside et al, 2023 ) and were categorised based on their dominant features. This may have resulted in the quality appraisal missing important aspects of the designs of some included studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%