2004
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Serum Creatinine To Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate: Accuracy in Good Health and in Chronic Kidney Disease

Abstract: The MDRD equation systematically underestimates GFR in healthy persons. A new equation developed with patients who have chronic kidney disease and healthy persons may be a step toward accurately estimating GFR when the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease is unknown.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
679
3
20

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 938 publications
(719 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
12
679
3
20
Order By: Relevance
“…The original and refitted MDRD equations may have limitations for estimating GFR in individuals with normal or near-normal kidney function [36,37]. Our preliminary observations suggest that estimated GFR using the refitted MDRD equation in Japanese diabetic patients is well correlated with values obtained using a quadratic GFR equation, which is reported to perform better than the MDRD equation in healthy individuals [21]. Although the performance of creatinine-based estimation of GFR remains at issue, the disputed factors would affect absolute values most, and are of less importance when assessing individual change in GFR over a long period, which was the main focus of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The original and refitted MDRD equations may have limitations for estimating GFR in individuals with normal or near-normal kidney function [36,37]. Our preliminary observations suggest that estimated GFR using the refitted MDRD equation in Japanese diabetic patients is well correlated with values obtained using a quadratic GFR equation, which is reported to perform better than the MDRD equation in healthy individuals [21]. Although the performance of creatinine-based estimation of GFR remains at issue, the disputed factors would affect absolute values most, and are of less importance when assessing individual change in GFR over a long period, which was the main focus of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…GFR was estimated using the following equation, originating from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study group [20], and refitted for Japanese individuals, as recently proposed by the Working Group of Japan Chronic Kidney Disease Initiative: GFR=186×SCr −1.154 ×Age −0.203 ×0.742 (if female)×0.881, where SCr=serum creatinine (unpublished). In a preliminary assessment of 9,312 Japanese diabetic individuals with serum creatinine <177 μmol/l and urinary ACR <300 mg/g creatinine, estimated GFR values using this equation were well-correlated with values obtained using a quadratic GFR equation [21] (r=0.865, p<0.001, Babazono et al, unpublished observations).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The Cockcroft‐Gault population did not include such a varied population, was only developed in hospitalized males, and data regarding whether any patients had CKD were not included. When the abbreviated MDRD formula was applied to CKD patients, the R 2 was 0.79, but in normal patients the R 2 was only 0.19 15. Furthermore, mean percentage error was −6.2% in CKD patients and −29% in healthy patients 15.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When the abbreviated MDRD formula was applied to CKD patients, the R 2 was 0.79, but in normal patients the R 2 was only 0.19 15. Furthermore, mean percentage error was −6.2% in CKD patients and −29% in healthy patients 15. The most recently developed prediction formula for GFR in human patients is the CKD‐EPI formula.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation