2020
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Serologic Testing to Assess the Effectiveness of Outbreak Control Efforts, Serial Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing, and Cohorting of Positive Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Patients in a Skilled Nursing Facility

Abstract: We characterized serology following a nursing home outbreak where residents were serially tested by RT-PCR and positive residents were cohorted. When tested 46-76 days later, 24/26 RT-PCR-positive residents were seropositive; none of the 124 RT-PCR-negative residents had confirmed seropositivity, supporting serial SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing and cohorting in nursing homes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Routine temperature screening independent of other diagnostic tools, 66,70 symptom-based testing, 16,53,54,60,61,64,65,107,108 and single point-prevalence screening by nasopharyngeal reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction following case identification, demonstrated limited effectiveness. 48,49,51,52,54,55,64,66,70,71 A single-cohort study examined postexposure prophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine to prevent transmission of COVID-19, with inconclusive results. 62…”
Section: Ineffective Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routine temperature screening independent of other diagnostic tools, 66,70 symptom-based testing, 16,53,54,60,61,64,65,107,108 and single point-prevalence screening by nasopharyngeal reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction following case identification, demonstrated limited effectiveness. 48,49,51,52,54,55,64,66,70,71 A single-cohort study examined postexposure prophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine to prevent transmission of COVID-19, with inconclusive results. 62…”
Section: Ineffective Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this study was to retrospectively describe the evolution of symptoms, infections, and mortality at a nursing facility in Val d'Oise (France) that had implemented a protocol for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Between 24 January and 3 July 2020, the nursing facility recorded a COVID-19 incidence of 51% based on the presence of one or more COVID-19 symptoms, 35% based on positive RT-PCR (amongst residents tested for RT-PCR) and 41% based on positive serology (amongst residents tested for serology), with a COVID-19 mortality rate of 8%, with incidence due to testing at the lower end of the range reported in the literature for nursing facilities (5,6,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33) (Table 5). The most commonly reported COVID-19 symptoms were fever (36%), cough (21%), dyspnea (21%) and asthenia (19%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Data in healthcare workers using serum serologic analysis shows that the presence of IgG antibodies from natural infection substantially reduces the risk of reinfection for the ensuing 6 months 17 . Two studies using serum samples to evaluate seroprevalence for SARS‐CoV‐2 in older adults in nursing homes showed high rates of seroconversion post‐outbreak, though sampling was only conducted on one occasion and therefore no information on duration beyond 5 weeks post‐ infection could be elicited 5,18 . Data in older adults specifically evaluating the duration of positivity beyond 3 months from infection are lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%