2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33093-3_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Sensorimotor Contingencies for Terrain Discrimination and Adaptive Walking Behavior in the Quadruped Robot Puppy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently there is a gap between the performance on the train set and the performance on the test set. This demonstrates the correlation of terrain classification performance and the actions of the robot, confirming the findings in [5].…”
Section: B System Classification Scoresupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently there is a gap between the performance on the train set and the performance on the test set. This demonstrates the correlation of terrain classification performance and the actions of the robot, confirming the findings in [5].…”
Section: B System Classification Scoresupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore has it been shown for quadruped robots that force-sensing in the legs and current-use in the motors deliver reasonable results upon processing with an Adaboost algorithm [4]. Even only using proprioceptive and contact sensors proved effective in ground discrimination [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar implications apply to other sensory modalities. For example, a quadruped robot running on different ground is critically able to improve terrain discrimination if a history of the actions taken (gaits used) is considered together with sensory stimulations induced in tactile, proprioceptive, and inertial sensors (Hoffmann et al 2012). …”
Section: Action In Robotic Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author varied the window size in the initial experiments, but the shorter length increased the classifier complexity (random forest size) without any gain in the accuracy. Similar to the this size, Hoffman et al [7] found the 6 seconds-long sensor readings the most accurate with their four-legged robot and an other work [5] concluded the 4 seconds-long window over 1 second. However, shorter windows can suit better for different robots or gaits; Bermudez et al [1] found a 350 msec time window enough for a running hexapod robot to maximize the model accuracy.…”
Section: Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This result outperformed all training times in [16], considering the weaker processor and the larger training set (12373 vs. 9203 samples in [16]) of this paper. The feature extraction with three FFT analyses took 3 msec on a MIPS CPU (576 Mhz) in AIBO and a smaller forest (rf 7,5 ) with 90.9% accuracy was selected because of the trade-offs in embedded platforms. This smaller RF predicted a surface in 20-90 ìsec with 833KB RAM.…”
Section: Computational Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%