2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2007.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using sensor data patterns from an automatic milking system to develop predictive variables for classifying clinical mastitis and abnormal milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) characterized the variability or shape of sensor measurements, and they were based on comparisons with previous quarter milkings or with other quarters in the same cow milking. This finding is in line with results from Kamphuis et al (2008a). They concluded that sensor data from the electrical conductivity and the color sensors blue and green contained the most information for abnormal milk or CM classification, and that variables based on the variability or shape (e.g., the range or increase) of sensor measurement patterns could be as predictive as variables based on the level of sensor measurement patterns (e.g., the mean value).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1) characterized the variability or shape of sensor measurements, and they were based on comparisons with previous quarter milkings or with other quarters in the same cow milking. This finding is in line with results from Kamphuis et al (2008a). They concluded that sensor data from the electrical conductivity and the color sensors blue and green contained the most information for abnormal milk or CM classification, and that variables based on the variability or shape (e.g., the range or increase) of sensor measurement patterns could be as predictive as variables based on the level of sensor measurement patterns (e.g., the mean value).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Raw sensor data of the electrical conductivity, color, and an estimation of quarter milk yield were collected by connecting a remote computer to each of the 12 automatic milking systems. From these raw sensor measurements, 1065 potentially descriptive variables were developed using a data flow diagram (Kamphuis et al, 2008a(Kamphuis et al, , 2010a. These variables described characteristics (level, variability, and shape) of sensor measurements patterns from each quarter milking.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most studied methods for cow mastitis detection using EC are based on processing data from EC sensors located at short milk tube or claw (also at gland level) and applying algorithms that consider the comparison of gland EC with the moving average of previous milkings (Lansberger et al 1994;Mele et al 2001;Biggadike et al 2002;Zecconi et al 2004;Cavero et al 2007; Kamphuis et al 2008a) and the comparison of EC of collateral glands (Maatje et al 1992(Maatje et al , 1997Lien et al 2005). In all these studies, specificity (SPEC) was around 90%, but sensitivity (SENS) was lower (different results were obtained depending on the study and type of mastitis: clinical, subclinical or somatic cell count (SCC) increases, from 25 to 89%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, the evaluation of electrical conductivity (EC) represents an interesting approach, because inflammation modifies the concentration of anions and cations and can affect milk EC (Zaninelli and Tangorra, 2007). As a consequence, in dairy cows, this parameter has become one of the most studied indicators of udder HS and its use to detect mastitis has been largely adopted with successful results in terms of sensitivity and specificity (De Mol et al, 1999;Kamphuis et al, 2008, Maatje et al, 1992Nielen et al, 1995;Tangorra et al, 2006). On the contrary, in dairy goats, this has not been the case, mainly because only few, and sometimes contradictory studies were published on the relationship between EC and udder HS (Argüello, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%