2010
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using semantic web rules to reason on an ontology of pseudogenes

Abstract: Motivation: Recent years have seen the development of a wide range of biomedical ontologies. Notable among these is Sequence Ontology (SO) which offers a rich hierarchy of terms and relationships that can be used to annotate genomic data. Well-designed formal ontologies allow data to be reasoned upon in a consistent and logically sound way and can lead to the discovery of new relationships. The Semantic Web Rules Language (SWRL) augments the capabilities of a reasoner by allowing the creation of conditional ru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hierarchy of these properties is shown in Supplemental Figure 3. The ontology allows not only comprehensive annotation of pseudogenes but also automatic queries against the pseudogene knowledge database (Holford et al 2010). The breakdown of the different biotypes within the GENCODE data set can be seen in Supplemental Table 4.…”
Section: Integration Of Pseudogenes Into Gencodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hierarchy of these properties is shown in Supplemental Figure 3. The ontology allows not only comprehensive annotation of pseudogenes but also automatic queries against the pseudogene knowledge database (Holford et al 2010). The breakdown of the different biotypes within the GENCODE data set can be seen in Supplemental Table 4.…”
Section: Integration Of Pseudogenes Into Gencodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, OWL has been designed from its inception to enable computer-assisted processing. Sadly enough, we and others observed that reasoning over large OWL ontologies suffers from severe computational tractability problems [11,22].…”
Section: Metarelmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Metarel is an RDF vocabulary that utilizes some of the language constructs offered by OWL Full, and it provides logical semantics to relations between classes. Deployment of Metarel in combination with the SPARQL/Update language [22] on an RDF store implements a query system that makes the implicit knowledge explicit and augments the store with inferred knowledge. This is achieved through the use of five rules (closures): Reflexivity, Transitivity, Priority over Subsumption, Super-relations and Chains.…”
Section: Metarelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 These three support the features of OWL 2, although only Pellet and HermiT support SWRL rules. However, the performance of these reasoner engines is compromised in the case of very large and complex ontologies, 54 and as of yet unfortunately, none of them is able to process the whole version of DINTO. Therefore, we adopt different strategies to simplify the ontology while maintaining the information that is necessary to retrieve the desired inferences.…”
Section: ■ Inference Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%