Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1835449.1835605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using search session context for named entity recognition in query

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of just using the current user query, Du et al [8] used the full search session to identify and classify named entities. Two search session features were used, namely, 'class features', the class of the named entity appearing in the previous query in the session, and the 'overlap feature' of the words between the previous and the current query.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of just using the current user query, Du et al [8] used the full search session to identify and classify named entities. Two search session features were used, namely, 'class features', the class of the named entity appearing in the previous query in the session, and the 'overlap feature' of the words between the previous and the current query.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Query annotation is a common practice in query understanding, such as query segmentation [11,25], name entity recognition [9,10] and part-of-speech tagging [2]. Query segmentation techniques segment a query into a number of semantic units, which is a basic preprocess in information retrieval.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Users commonly keep a substring invariable when reformulating queries to clarify their intents, moreover, this invariable substring generally corresponds to a semantic unit [9]. Instead of pre-segmenting the individual queries into words, we employ a naï ve strategy.…”
Section: Learning the Model Lexiconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because queries are usually very short and, therefore, contextual information (i.e. words surrounding a word), which usually helps the disambiguation process in texts, is very limited see Du et al (2010) for an approach that uses queries in the same search session as a context to improve NER in a query). Moreover, very often, terms in queries are not in standard form (e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%