2006
DOI: 10.1175/bams-87-6-787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using SAR Remote Sensing, Field Observations, and Models to Better Understand Coastal Flows in the Gulf of Alaska

Abstract: A synergistic approach using synthetic aperture radar, mesoscale modeling, and aircraft observations has improved our understanding of barrier jets in the Gulf of Alaska.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some hybrid jets were detached 10-15 km from the coast, while others had sharp wind speed boundaries (shock jets), which does not conform to the gradual offshore weakening of barrier jets observed in other studies (Parish 1982). Olson et al (2007, hereafter OL07) detailed the structure and dynamics of a classical and hybrid jet sampled during the Southern Alaskan Regional Jets Experiment (SARJET; Winstead et al 2006). The classical jet had maximum winds Ͼ30 m s Ϫ1 at the coast between 600 and 800 m above mean sea level (MSL) and an offshore extent of ϳ60 km, whereas the hybrid jet of ϳ30 m s Ϫ1 was displaced 30-40 km offshore at 500 m above MSL (OL07, their Figs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Some hybrid jets were detached 10-15 km from the coast, while others had sharp wind speed boundaries (shock jets), which does not conform to the gradual offshore weakening of barrier jets observed in other studies (Parish 1982). Olson et al (2007, hereafter OL07) detailed the structure and dynamics of a classical and hybrid jet sampled during the Southern Alaskan Regional Jets Experiment (SARJET; Winstead et al 2006). The classical jet had maximum winds Ͼ30 m s Ϫ1 at the coast between 600 and 800 m above mean sea level (MSL) and an offshore extent of ϳ60 km, whereas the hybrid jet of ϳ30 m s Ϫ1 was displaced 30-40 km offshore at 500 m above MSL (OL07, their Figs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The frequency of observation varies according to location and is generally low compared to coarse-resolution satellite sensors and site measurements. A major advantage of SAR data in connection with offshore wind resource assessment is the ability to resolve mesoscale wind variations caused by topography in near-coastal areas (Alpers et al 2009;Winstead et al 2006;Young and Winstead 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precipitation distribution in the Alps and Apennines has also been related to both the degree of flow blocking by topography (e.g., Medina and Houze 2003) and the amount of entrainment of moist low-level air into unblocked flow aloft (e.g., Bousquet and Smull 2006). Prefrontal low-level blocking has been observed to aid rapid weakening of a cold front as it approached the Pacific Cascades (Bond et al 2005), and topographic barrier jets have been observed by synthetic aperture radar in the Gulf of Alaska (Winstead et al 2006). In addition to these observational studies, there are multiple theoretical experiments that describe the inverse relationship between the Froude number and the degree of frontal retardation (e.g., Egger and Hoinka 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%