2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using saccade tasks as a tool to analyze executive dysfunctions in schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
58
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
58
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, antisaccade effects and switch paradigm congruity costs, though related, are not identical. Nonetheless, it is interesting to note that, in an antisaccade/prosaccade task-switching paradigm, schizophrenic patients show intact switch capabilities combined with an increased difficulty to suppress the default prosaccade (Levy et al, 1998;Barton et al, 2002;Manoach et al, 2002;Reuter and Kathmann, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, antisaccade effects and switch paradigm congruity costs, though related, are not identical. Nonetheless, it is interesting to note that, in an antisaccade/prosaccade task-switching paradigm, schizophrenic patients show intact switch capabilities combined with an increased difficulty to suppress the default prosaccade (Levy et al, 1998;Barton et al, 2002;Manoach et al, 2002;Reuter and Kathmann, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent accounts, however, take on board the suggestion made by currently influential models of cognitive control that inhibition of erroneous information processing occurs as a direct consequence of successful activation of processing routes required to perform the correct response (Miller & Cohen, 2001). As a result recent models of antisaccade performance emphasize cognitive constructs such as working memory, goal or intention activation, and attentional focus (Mitchell, Macrae, & Gilchrist, 2002;Nieuwenhuis, Broerse, Nielen, & de Jong, 2004;Reuter & Kathmann, 2004). Although differing somewhat in terminology and detail, these accounts suggest that correct antisaccade performance depends upon the ability to adequately maintain the relevant task instructions, or sufficiently activate the intention to make an antisaccade.…”
Section: -*9#(-:(!0$2#and''and*(610'$2-0(mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average antisaccade error rates in healthy humans vary considerably across studies and laboratories, with some studies reporting rates as low as 5% and others as high as 25% (Reuter & Kathmann, 2004). Recent studies using large samples suggest an error rate of around 20% is typical (Ettinger et al, 2003a(Ettinger et al, , 2005bSmyrnis et al, 2002; Tatler & Hutton, in submission; see also Everling & Fischer, 1998).…”
Section: '(4*#*and%'5(620207#((mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some reviewers have suggested that antisaccade deficits in schizophrenia index deficits in attentional control leading to difficulties with goal directed behaviour more generally (Nieuwenhuis et al, 2004;Reuter & Kathmann, 2004). In this view, antisaccade deficits may arise from a general difficulty with goal neglect, operationalised by Duncan (1995) as the tendency to disregard task requirements even though they are understood and remembered.…”
Section: Response Inhibition and Attentional Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%