2010
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v18i3.771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using routinely collected data to evaluate a leaflet campaign to increase the presentation of people with memory problems to general practice: a locality based controlled study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These were very heterogeneous (Table 4). Three studies evaluated the impact of introducing memory clinics (Banerjee et al, 2007;Luce et al, 2001;Ramakers and Verhey, 2011); two leaflet campaigns (Chan et al, 2010;Seabrooke and Milne, 2009) and one a geriatric liaison nurse assessment service (Perry et al, 2008).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These were very heterogeneous (Table 4). Three studies evaluated the impact of introducing memory clinics (Banerjee et al, 2007;Luce et al, 2001;Ramakers and Verhey, 2011); two leaflet campaigns (Chan et al, 2010;Seabrooke and Milne, 2009) and one a geriatric liaison nurse assessment service (Perry et al, 2008).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary outcomes were the following: dementia diagnosed by specialists using validated measures (six studies) (Banerjee et al, 2007;Boise et al, 2010;Luce et al, 2001;Pond et al, 1994;Ramakers and Verhey, 2011;Rondeau et al, 2008); a record of cognitive impairment or dementia diagnosis in participants' medical notes (six studies) (Barton et al, 2006;Borson et al, 2007;Chan et al, 2010;Downs et al, 2006;Iliffe et al, 2013;Perry et al, 2008); and the numbers of people presenting to their GP with memory complaints (one study) (Seabrooke and Milne, 2009). In addition, two studies (Barton et al, 2006;Luce et al, 2001)…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem titles not always entered into primary care records and the nature of the short consultation in primary care means that not all data are recorded; incompleteness of data is a considerable limitation in its interpretation. Data quality in mental health is challenging [35]. People without a mental health problem coded in their computer record may have had appropriate data recorded as free-text or have a physical health problem label (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…encounter data and sick notes); we have documented common difficulties across several localities. [25][26][27] Technical problems include the different ways the various brands of computer system interface with the same coding system, 28 and the use of system specific codes; no standard has ever been mandated for the recording of encounter data.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%