Using Risk Analysis for Flood Protection Assessment

Zeleňáková, Martina; Zvijáková, Lenka

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52150-3

Cited by 13 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Examples of both categories are set out below, in Figure 5. The next differentiation of methods in the EIA process is given also in Zeleňáková and Zvijáková (2017) [22]. Table 1 presents the recommended methods suitable for impact assessment in The next differentiation of methods in the EIA process is given also in Zeleňáková and Zvijáková (2017) [22].…”

Section: Application Of the Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The next differentiation of methods in the EIA process is given also in Zeleňáková and Zvijáková (2017) [22]. Table 1 presents the recommended methods suitable for impact assessment in The next differentiation of methods in the EIA process is given also in Zeleňáková and Zvijáková (2017) [22]. Table 1 presents the recommended methods suitable for impact assessment in the preliminary impact study, environmental impact statement and methods of multicriteria analysis.…”

Section: Application Of the Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 1 presents the recommended methods suitable for impact assessment in the preliminary impact study, environmental impact statement and methods of multicriteria analysis. [22].…”

Section: Application Of the Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The 2006 EIA Act introduced no major changes in EIA procedures; it tightened certain procedural time limits and better delineated EIA responsibilities between the Ministry of the Environment and the regional and district environment offices. The Act was amended many times to respect all requirements of European Union; the last amendment was in June 2017, which was devoted to public participation in the EIA process [22].…”

Section: Description Of the Study Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Act was amended many times to respect all requirements of European Union; the last amendment was in June 2017, which was devoted to public participation in the EIA process [22].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Selection of the Best Alternative of Heating System by Environmental Impact Assessment—Case Study

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The Framework Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources aims at developing the local and regional electricity market in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A comparison study of the proposed activities of construction of a new biomass-fired power plant or reconstruction of an old one-gas power plant in town located in eastern Slovakia is presented in this paper. The method of the index coefficient was used for choosing the best alternatives. Multicriteria analysis proved that the construction of biomass-fired power plant is the most suitable solution chosen from three assessed variants (no activity is implemented, biomass power plant and modernized gas boiler).

show abstract

Section: Application Of the Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Application Of the Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 1 presents the recommended methods suitable for impact assessment in the preliminary impact study, environmental impact statement and methods of multicriteria analysis. [22].…”

Section: Application Of the Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Description Of the Study Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Act was amended many times to respect all requirements of European Union; the last amendment was in June 2017, which was devoted to public participation in the EIA process [22].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations