2019
DOI: 10.15294/eej.v9i4.31794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking Skills (Hots) in Reading Comprehension Questions of English Textbook for Year X of High School

Abstract: Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) has been widely recognized as a set of important devices of cognitive development. The research was conducted to evaluate the availability of higher order thinking skills in reading comprehension questions of the English textbook for Year X of high school published by ministry of education. There are 158 reading comprehension questions from 15 reading texts which are analyzed using revised Bloom’s taxonomy. An intuitive approach to the analysis of qualitative data is taken… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows that the textbook being analyzed emphasized more on lower order thinking questions. This result is in line with researchs from NamazianDoost and Hayavimehr (2017), Mizbani, Salehi, and Tabatabaei (2020), Atiullah, Fitriati, andRukmini (2019), andFebriyani, Yunita, andDamayanti (2020) which informs that almost all the textbooks that have been examined mostly have more questions in the lower order thinking level. Regarding to the research question and the objective of the research, the level used by the author of the textbook in designing the textbook's reading comprehension questions could be seen in this table.…”
Section: Questionssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It shows that the textbook being analyzed emphasized more on lower order thinking questions. This result is in line with researchs from NamazianDoost and Hayavimehr (2017), Mizbani, Salehi, and Tabatabaei (2020), Atiullah, Fitriati, andRukmini (2019), andFebriyani, Yunita, andDamayanti (2020) which informs that almost all the textbooks that have been examined mostly have more questions in the lower order thinking level. Regarding to the research question and the objective of the research, the level used by the author of the textbook in designing the textbook's reading comprehension questions could be seen in this table.…”
Section: Questionssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…finding main idea, supporting details, and etc. Reading could be more complex if the students lack of Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) (Atiullah, Fitriati, and Rukmini, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chow et al (2021) investigated the reading performance of Chinese English as a second language (ESL) undergraduates. In the context of developing countries, most studies have focused on examining HOTS levels in academic reading materials and teaching (Aziz et al, 2017;Atiullah et al, 2019;Singh and Shaari, 2019;Ulum, 2021), and investigating the relationship between HOTS and reading performance, using critical thinking tests (Thamrin and Widodo, 2019;Tanudjaya and Doorman, 2020). The studies on explicit modeling of HOTS levels of the learner, instead of classroom materials or discourse, using HOTS-based reading tests are scarce in the context of developing countries (Mogaji et al, 2022) such as Pakistan (Hoodbhoy, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the lowest to the greatest level, there are six taxonomically based stages of learning. Knowledge, understanding, application, analysis, synthesis, and assessment are all parts of the learning process (Atiullah et al, 2019;Johansson, 2020). Redesigned taxonomy of student learning levels was developed in response to a shift in emphasis toward more effective learning and evaluation goals (Mrah, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%