2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1315(01)00077-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using remote laboratories to extend access to science and engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These instantiations depended on remote controlled lab apparatus, collaborative tools and an accessible user interface sub-system. Certain aspects of the work are reported in Colwell et al (2002), Scanlon et al (2004) and Cooper (2007).…”
Section: Case Study 1: the Socio-cultural Approach-the Pearl Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These instantiations depended on remote controlled lab apparatus, collaborative tools and an accessible user interface sub-system. Certain aspects of the work are reported in Colwell et al (2002), Scanlon et al (2004) and Cooper (2007).…”
Section: Case Study 1: the Socio-cultural Approach-the Pearl Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, posting low-cost equipment to the student [1], providing simulation environments, including immersive virtual reality environments [2], or providing a remote connection to equipment [3]. The increasing use of touchscreen and mobile-phone based interfaces to equipment indicates the growing trend for computers to mediate human interactions with equipment, and laboratory work is no different [4].…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Home experiment kits were sent to students. In the early 2000s, the institution explored remote laboratory work as part of the "part-time education for adults returning to learn" (PEARL) project [3,12], along with Trinity College Dublin and the University of Porto. Equipment included a spectrophotometer, and students could even upload scripts to run the hardware.…”
Section: Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disadvantages result from high needs regarding space, instructor time, and experimental infrastructure; all leading to rising costs [19]. Due to the limitation of resources, hands-on labs are also incapable of meeting special needs regarding disabled students [20] or distant users [21].…”
Section: Laboratoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%