2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2007.00402.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using relational reflexivity as a resource in teaching family therapy

Abstract: In this paper we talk about creating coherence and transparency in the relationships between teacher, model of adult learning and subject taught. We describe how we have made connections between adult learning theory and family therapy to generate resources for action in teaching on the qualifying level course at Northumbria University. Using a recent teaching session and the voices of trainees, we illustrate these connections with an example of teaching about relational reflexivity, using methods which enable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…My preference for an overall 'epistemology of dialogism and reflexivity' (see also Neden and Burnham, 2007) made me start questioning what I perceived as a 'monologic process', with a 'cryptic' quality, entailing a commitment to a first order epistemology: somehow our voice had to be the 'final one', non-transparent to the rest of the group, as if we are responsible for detecting the 'deficits' in the trainees' course and then intervene to 'correct' them by means of providing the 'appropriate' feedback. In my search for a process which could both attend to our responsibility to communicate our 'expertise' and 'knowledge' and at the same time enhance collaboration, transparency, multiplicity of voices and thus reflexivity, I turned once again to the innovative variations of the reflecting team approach introduced by a 'polyphonic dialogic' approach to language, in Jaako Seikkula's work (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My preference for an overall 'epistemology of dialogism and reflexivity' (see also Neden and Burnham, 2007) made me start questioning what I perceived as a 'monologic process', with a 'cryptic' quality, entailing a commitment to a first order epistemology: somehow our voice had to be the 'final one', non-transparent to the rest of the group, as if we are responsible for detecting the 'deficits' in the trainees' course and then intervene to 'correct' them by means of providing the 'appropriate' feedback. In my search for a process which could both attend to our responsibility to communicate our 'expertise' and 'knowledge' and at the same time enhance collaboration, transparency, multiplicity of voices and thus reflexivity, I turned once again to the innovative variations of the reflecting team approach introduced by a 'polyphonic dialogic' approach to language, in Jaako Seikkula's work (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the supervisory context has been a rich, ongoing resource to help me explore spiritual relational reflexivity. During my family therapy training, my tutor Jeanette Neden (Neden & Burnham, ) would refer to the recursive ripples of learning (Race, ). In this paper I reflect on my experiences of the emerging ripples within the context of spirituality in my personal and professional context.…”
Section: Re‐membering Practices and My Internalised Others’ As A Spirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequential use of two different story-making frameworks and storytelling exercises transformed a potentially reductionist structural framework, that is, linear history, into a generative reservoir of new meanings. Learning took place in 'continuous, reflexive and interacting processes stimulated across multiple levels, through connections between inner and outer contexts of experience' (Neden & Burnham, 2007). Race (2001) describes adult learning as emerging from a combination of multi-dimensional processes that overlap.…”
Section: Becoming a Curator Of Artefacts And Stories In The Teaching mentioning
confidence: 99%