2019
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/rukv3
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using recurrent neural networks to improve the perception of speech in non-stationary noise by people with cochlear implants

Abstract: Speech-in-noise perception is a major problem for users of cochlear implants (CIs), especially with non-stationary background noise such as competing talkers or traffic. Algorithms that facilitate speech perception by attenuating background noise have produced benefits but relied on a priori information about the target speaker and/or background noise. We developed a recurrent neural network (RNN) algorithm for enhancing speech in non-stationary noise and evaluated its benefits for speech perception, using obj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SE process consists of two parts: to enhance the intelligibility and quality of processed speech, and to reduce the noises in the background. Previous well-established algorithms have helped improve the SE in CI users [37], [38], [29], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43] but there are only few studies with a newly upgrading deep-learning-based algorithm. Traditional SE methods are based on identifying the difference between clean and noisy speech [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SE process consists of two parts: to enhance the intelligibility and quality of processed speech, and to reduce the noises in the background. Previous well-established algorithms have helped improve the SE in CI users [37], [38], [29], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43] but there are only few studies with a newly upgrading deep-learning-based algorithm. Traditional SE methods are based on identifying the difference between clean and noisy speech [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%