Using Rasch analysis to evaluate the psychometric functioning of the other-directed, lighthearted, intellectual, and whimsical (OLIW) adult playfulness scale

Davis, Darrel R.; Boone, William J.

doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100054

Cited by 14 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ideally, all scaled response options should be used ( Davis and Boone, 2021 ). We carefully worded items for neutrality within the performance scale they are allocated to, which helped increase the gradual distribution of item responses around the fifth option as the scale midpoint.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Bar-On Model and Multifactor Measure of Human Performance: Validation and Application

Bar‐On¹,

Dijk

2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, we describe the ongoing validation and application of the Bar-On model of human performance that is assessed with the Multifactor Measure of Performance (MMP). (The Bar-On Multifactor Measure of Performance (MMP) is the intellectual property of Into Performance ULC.) The MMP is a psychometric instrument designed to study, evaluate and enhance performance. We discuss the meaning and importance of performance, and explain the need for creating and applying a comprehensive model and measure of this construct. To address this need, the MMP is structurally organized to assess and strengthen 18 Core Factors that contribute to performance. Five Ring Factors were added to facilitate a deeper understanding of leadership, industriousness, productiveness, risk for burnout, and coachability. Together, they represent a multifactor approach that focuses on current behavior of the “whole person” by evaluating physical, cognitive, personal, social, and inspirational factors combined. We discuss the properties of the MMP’s normative population, as the baseline for accurate reporting, tailored to different workplace activities and needs. Possible limitations of the research are indicated, together with the need for additional studies to address them. We reflect on the MMP within the Unified Validity Framework and conclude with recommendations for researchers and practitioners to apply this model and measure.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Bar-On Model and Multifactor Measure of Human Performance: Validation and Application

Bar‐On¹,

Dijk

2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Outfit includes the differences for all items, irrespective of how far the item difficulty is from the ability of the person 30 . An item MnSq fit statistic of the range from 0.5 to 1.5 is an acceptable fit to the Rasch model 38,39 . Positive and high values (>0.3) of point‐measure correlation indicated that the items were working in the same direction to measure a single basic construct 40 .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…30 An item MnSq fit statistic of the range from 0.5 to 1.5 is an acceptable fit to the Rasch model. 38,39 Positive and high values (>0.3) of point-measure correlation indicated that the items were working in the same direction to measure a single basic construct. 40 In the Rasch model analysis, reliability indices above 0.8 and 0.9, and equivalently, separation indices larger than 2 and 3, were considered good and excellent, respectively.…”

Section: Testing Validity With Rasch Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Korean Leeds satisfaction questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis with Rasch models

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives We conducted the cross‐cultural adaptation and validation of the Leeds Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Korea. Methods The adaptation of the LSQ from English into Korean was based on guidelines for cross‐cultural adaptation for self‐report measures. Patients with RA were recruited from an outpatient clinic of a university hospital in South Korea. Validation of the Korean‐LSQ with Rasch models was carried out using WINSTEPS. Model fit was determined by Infit and Outfit statistics (≥0.50 and ≤1.50), including the separation index (≥2.00) and reliability index (≥0.80). Results The data set comprised 125 patients (82.4% female), with median (interquartile range) age 49.0 (37‐57) years, and disease duration of 2.5 (1.2‐3.8) years. The total and subscale scores of the Korean‐LSQ demonstrated excellent or good test‐retest reliability (0.88 for total, 0.71‐0.82 for subscales), and items in the scale also revealed a high internal consistency (α = 0.93). The six subscales of the Korean‐LSQ were found to have a good fit to the Rasch model and good reliability (Person separation index = 2.63 and reliability index = 0.87; item separation index = 37.03 and reliability index >0.99). In addition, the unidimensionality of the scale was confirmed by the principal component analysis based on the Rasch residuals. Conclusion Fit to the Rasch model confirmed that the construct validity, reliability, and unidimensionality of the LSQ were preserved following the adaptation into Korean. The Korean‐LSQ is a valid and reliable tool for measuring satisfaction with care in Korean patients with RA.

show abstract

“…The OLIW questionnaire has been used in several countries outside of Germany, such as Australia, Brazil, the United States, and the United Kingdom using English and Portuguese language versions (e.g., Clifford et al, 2022;de Moraes et al, 2021;Farley et al 2021). Studies testing the factorial structure and item and scale properties in item response theory analyses supported the psychometric soundness of the instrument (Brauer et al, 2023a;Clifford et al, 2022;Davis & Boone, 2021;Farley et al, 2021;Proyer, 2017). further examined the 12-item short form (OLIW-S) that was introduced in Proyer's (2017) original study of the retest stability of the standard measure in four independently collected German-speaking samples.…”

Section: The Oliw and Oliw-s Questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

An Analysis of the Hebrew Translation of the OLIW-S to Assess Adult Playfulness

Rubinstein,

Lahad,

Weinstock

et al. 2023

Psychological Test Adaptation and Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adult playfulness is an individual difference variable that receives increasing interest. A multifacetted model of playfulness distinguishes between Other-directed, Lighthearted, Intellectual, and Whimsical playfulness. A 12-item brief version to assess these four facets with three items each, the OLIW-S, has been introduced in German. In this study, we investigate the psychometric properties of the Hebrew translation of the OLIW-S in an Israeli sample ( N = 298). Our analyses of the item and scale parameters showed acceptable internal consistencies for short scales aimed for research purposes (αs and ωs between .53 and .80), item-total correlations, factorial validity, and metric measurement invariance with the original German language version (German sample, N = 302). Overall, our findings provide initial evidence for the psychometric qualities of the Hebrew translation of the OLIW-S, and analyses using the data from Germany replicate prior findings. We discuss future perspectives for extending the study of the reliability and validity of the Hebrew OLIW-S.

show abstract

Using Rasch analysis to evaluate the psychometric functioning of the other-directed, lighthearted, intellectual, and whimsical (OLIW) adult playfulness scale

Cited by 14 publications

References 23 publications

The Bar-On Model and Multifactor Measure of Human Performance: Validation and Application

The Bar-On Model and Multifactor Measure of Human Performance: Validation and Application

Validation of the Korean Leeds satisfaction questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis with Rasch models

An Analysis of the Hebrew Translation of the OLIW-S to Assess Adult Playfulness

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About