2020
DOI: 10.5334/labphon.192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Rapid Prosody Transcription to probe little-known prosodic systems: The case of Papuan Malay

Abstract: This paper shows how the Rapid Prosody Transcription method (RPT, cp. Cole & Shattuck-Hufnagel, 2016) can be utilized when investigating the prosodic systems of a little-described language. We report the results of a set of perception experiments on the prosody of Papuan Malay, which support the claim made in earlier (production) studies that Malayic varieties appear to lack stress (i.e., lexical stress as well as post-lexical pitch accents). We show that interrater agreement of speakers of Papuan Malay is muc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We bring forth results from two perception experiments on the prosody of Albanian, which provide important evidence in the perceptibility of prosodic and non-prosodic correlates in the language's prosodic system, shedding more light on its complexity. Albanian listeners in this study show moderate to substantial agreement in the perception of both prosodic prominences and boundaries, conforming to what has been found in RPT studies from other languages so far Baumann & Winter, 2015;Riesberg at al, 2020). In doing so, listeners' perception of prosodic structure correlates with both prosodic cues, i.e.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We bring forth results from two perception experiments on the prosody of Albanian, which provide important evidence in the perceptibility of prosodic and non-prosodic correlates in the language's prosodic system, shedding more light on its complexity. Albanian listeners in this study show moderate to substantial agreement in the perception of both prosodic prominences and boundaries, conforming to what has been found in RPT studies from other languages so far Baumann & Winter, 2015;Riesberg at al, 2020). In doing so, listeners' perception of prosodic structure correlates with both prosodic cues, i.e.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Possible ways to resolve this issue are to exclude judgments for the last word, as done in previous RPT studies (e.g. Riesberg et al, 2018Riesberg et al, , 2020, or to include excerpts where the end of the audio file does not coincide with the end of an utterance. Alternately, listeners could be explicitly instructed to consider whether the final words of a file might also be the end of a group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 As Ladd and Arvaniti (2023) discuss, a purely general definition of prominence can be disadvantageous in that it does not facilitate discussion of variation across languages in how prominence is produced and perceived (e.g., Riesberg, Kalbertodt, Baumann, & Himmelmann, 2020).…”
Section: Defining Prominencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recordings were made at the Center for Endangered Languages Documentation (CELD) in Manokwari, West Papua (Riesberg & Himmelmann, 2012–2014). Participants received instructions about the experimental procedure before the start of the task.…”
Section: Production Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%