2020
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-2020-282
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using rapid damage observations from social media for Bayesian updating of hurricane vulnerability functions: A case study of Hurricane Dorian

Abstract: Abstract. Rapid impact assessments immediately after disasters are crucial to enable rapid and effective mobilization of resources for response and recovery efforts. These assessments are often performed by analysing the three components of risk: hazard, exposure and vulnerability. Vulnerability curves are often constructed using historic insurance data or expert judgments, reducing their applicability for the characteristics of the specific hazard and building stock. Therefore, this paper outlines an approach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if vulnerability curves were available, these are dependent on both the hazard component and damage observations. Since wind speeds as part of the uncertainty within the process, many vulnerability functions being characterized as semi-empirical (e.g., Mason and Parackal, 2015;Pita et al, 2015;Smith et al, 2020;Walker, 2011) and direct comparison would be unproductive.…”
Section: Interactive Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if vulnerability curves were available, these are dependent on both the hazard component and damage observations. Since wind speeds as part of the uncertainty within the process, many vulnerability functions being characterized as semi-empirical (e.g., Mason and Parackal, 2015;Pita et al, 2015;Smith et al, 2020;Walker, 2011) and direct comparison would be unproductive.…”
Section: Interactive Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as semi-empirical (e.g., Mason and Parackal, 2015;Pita et al, 2015;Smith et al, 2020;Walker, 2011) and direct comparison would be unproductive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%