2021
DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2021.93.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Rank-Order Judgments Scaling for Political Tactics Used by Teachers and School Principals

Abstract: The primary aim of the current study is to identify whether there is a significant difference between students' academic achievements and the matching of students' learning styles to the teaching styles of their instructors. Research Methods: This research was designed as a survey study and employing the quantitative research methodology. The participants consisted of 479 students enrolled in a course titled "Introduction to Computers". The Grasha-Riechmann Learning Styles and Teaching Style Inventories were u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When we reviewed the literature, we realized that the analyses were carried out in Microsoft Excel on the grounds the traditional method in studies in which the scaling with ranking judgments was utilized (e.g., Bal, 2011;Bozgeyikli and Kesici, 2016;Bozgeyikli and Toprak, 2013;Demirçelik et al, 2021;Gezer and İlhan, 2018;Örs Özdil and Kınay, 2015;Özdemir, 2021;Şahin et al, 2015;Şahin, Sarkın and Taşdemir, 2019;Toprak et al 2020;Yalçın and Şengül-Avşar, 2014;Yıldırım, Seheryeli and Anıl, 2020). A multi-step process is followed while the data collected by means of the ranking judgments are analyzed according to traditional method in Microsoft Excel.…”
Section: Analysis Of Data Collected By Ranking Judgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we reviewed the literature, we realized that the analyses were carried out in Microsoft Excel on the grounds the traditional method in studies in which the scaling with ranking judgments was utilized (e.g., Bal, 2011;Bozgeyikli and Kesici, 2016;Bozgeyikli and Toprak, 2013;Demirçelik et al, 2021;Gezer and İlhan, 2018;Örs Özdil and Kınay, 2015;Özdemir, 2021;Şahin et al, 2015;Şahin, Sarkın and Taşdemir, 2019;Toprak et al 2020;Yalçın and Şengül-Avşar, 2014;Yıldırım, Seheryeli and Anıl, 2020). A multi-step process is followed while the data collected by means of the ranking judgments are analyzed according to traditional method in Microsoft Excel.…”
Section: Analysis Of Data Collected By Ranking Judgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%