2014
DOI: 10.1515/jqas-2013-0100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using random forests to estimate win probability before each play of an NFL game

Abstract: Before any play of a National Football League (NFL) game, the probability that a given team will win depends on many situational variables (such as time remaining, yards to go for a first down, field position and current score) as well as the relative quality of the two teams as quantified by the Las Vegas point spread. We use a random forest method to combine pre-play variables to estimate Win Probability (WP) before any play of an NFL game. When a subset of NFL play-by-play data for the 12 seasons from 2001 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the evaluation of the EP model, we again use LOSO CV to select the above model, which yields the best calibration results. Figure 6 shows the calibration plots by quarter, mimicking the approach of Lopez (2017) and Yam and Lopez (2018), who evaluate both our W P model and that of Lock and Nettleton (2014). The observed proportion of wins closely matches the expected proportion of wins within each bin for each quarter, indicating that the model is well-calibrated across all quarters of play and across the spectrum of possible win probabilities.…”
Section: Win Probability Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to the evaluation of the EP model, we again use LOSO CV to select the above model, which yields the best calibration results. Figure 6 shows the calibration plots by quarter, mimicking the approach of Lopez (2017) and Yam and Lopez (2018), who evaluate both our W P model and that of Lock and Nettleton (2014). The observed proportion of wins closely matches the expected proportion of wins within each bin for each quarter, indicating that the model is well-calibrated across all quarters of play and across the spectrum of possible win probabilities.…”
Section: Win Probability Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…With the notable exception of Lock and Nettleton (2014), researchers typically only vaguely discuss the methodology used for modeling expected points and/or win probability. Additionally, prior researchers in this area typically do not provide their specific expected points and win probability estimates publicly for other researchers to use and explore.…”
Section: Novel Statistical Methods For Play Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One disadvantage of the empirical approach in computing win probabilities is that one has to subjectively decide how to bin or partition the variables (time remaining, field position, and score differential) to get reasonable estimates of the win probabilities. Lock and Nettleton illustrate the use of random forests methodology which uses the data to adaptively choose the partitioning of the variables to minimize prediction error. In addition, their methodology uses pre‐game point spreads to adjust the probabilities of the teams winning at the beginning of the game.…”
Section: Win Probabilities In Footballmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lock and Nettleton provide several applications of the win probability methodology. Changes in win probabilities can be used to judge the most influential plays in a given football game.…”
Section: Win Probabilities In Footballmentioning
confidence: 99%