2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2007.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using radar direct wave for concrete condition assessment: Correlation with electrical resistivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other antenna parameters, such as the signal amplitude of the wavelet, can be used to evaluate the EM properties of the material in the region near the antennas, where the signal propagates through a surface material [10] and [11]. The potential of estimating the soil's dielectric parameters using the high attenuation and temporal stretching of the EM signal amplitude has been demonstrated experimentally and validated by numerical simulations and on-site measurements [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, other antenna parameters, such as the signal amplitude of the wavelet, can be used to evaluate the EM properties of the material in the region near the antennas, where the signal propagates through a surface material [10] and [11]. The potential of estimating the soil's dielectric parameters using the high attenuation and temporal stretching of the EM signal amplitude has been demonstrated experimentally and validated by numerical simulations and on-site measurements [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several controlled experiments, numerical simulations, and 'real-life' applications have been conducted to study the effects of EM parameter variations on antenna-material coupling [11]. This introductory paper shows archaeological and cultural heritage applications of examining very low EM signal amplitudes that are caused by high attenuation, poor antenna coupling, and temporal stretching.…”
Section: Final Remarks and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e G PR method is widely used in civil engineering to detect c r a c ks between concrete and steel [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]; in hydrogeology and sedimentology [13,[30][31][32]; in archelogy [33,34]; in agriculture for soil types [35]. Despite of the small depth of investigation of GPR, this nondestructive technique has become more popular in recent years for the evaluation of near surface structures through its simplicity and speed of implementation.…”
Section: Internal Structure Of the Dam From Geophysical Observation Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, several researchers decided to use other non-destructive methods modifying the frequency spectra (Sbartaï, Laurens, Rhazi, Balayssac, & Arliguie, 2007;, using mechanical means and combining several non-destructive testing Breysse, Klysz, Dérobert, Sirieix, & Lataste, 2008;Villain, Sbartaï, Dérobert, Garnier, & Balayssac, 2012), to decorrelate uncertainties in order to get quantitative data. However, many additional studies are still necessary before traditional destructive on site methods may be replaced by non destructive investigations (Lamarre, Saussol, & Chataigner, 2011a, 2011b, 2011cSaussol, Rabasse, & Aubagnac, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%