Using Q‐methodology to understand stakeholder perspectives on a carnivore translocation

Abstract

Reversing global declines in predator populations is a major conservation objective, though people frequently come into conflict over carnivore conservation. As part of a national recovery programme for the pine marten Martes martes, a protected mesocarnivore in the UK, we used Q‐methodology to understand the perspectives of residents living in an area in which a pine marten translocation project was planned. In contrast to binary ‘for or against’ characterizations of debates surrounding such projects, we identified four perspectives with distinct priorities and concerns. A single perspective, ‘Concerned Manager’, opposed the translocation and marten recovery more generally, was apprehensive about impacts and favoured traditional predator management practices. Support was characterized by three perspectives: ‘Environmental Protectionist’, ‘Natural Resource Steward’ and ‘Cautious Pragmatist’. Two explicitly supported the translocation but differed in their priorities: Environmental Protectionist framed marten restoration as an ethical imperative, whereas Natural Resource Steward emphasized ecological and economic benefits. Cautious Pragmatist supported marten recovery, but expressed ambivalence about the translocation. We identified areas of divergence between the four perspectives, particularly surrounding risks posed by martens and need for predator control. We identified two areas of consensus among the four perspectives: support for a biodiverse environment and translocations as a means of achieving this (though this was contingent on the species), and agreement there would be economic and ecological benefits if martens controlled non‐native grey squirrels Sciurus carolinensis. We highlight that perspectives on this project were influenced by wider issues of wildlife management and conservation, particularly the impact and management of increasing populations of another mesocarnivore, the badger Meles meles. Negative experiences and perceptions of badgers were germane to the Concerned Manager perspective, and their fear that protected status would preclude marten population control. ‘Rewilding’ emerged as a divisive background issue, against which some participants evaluated the translocation. In facilitating understanding of perspectives and establishing the contexts through which they were formed, we found that Q‐methodology enabled us, as a team comprising conservation practitioners and researchers, to engage meaningfully with affected residents. We recommend the tool as a useful step in assessing social feasibility of conservation translocations. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

Beavers and flood alleviation: Human perspectives from downstream communities

“…Greater emphasis is, however, placed upon disagreement with a potential for beaver tourism, and displeasure is expressed at the possibilities of seeing beavers or visiting a beaver wetland. By reviewing the comments of participants whose sorts loaded onto this factor, it appears this may be linked to wider opposition to species reintroductions, particularly from local contextual experiences of wild boar and pine marten in the Forest of Dean (for more on these reintroductions, please see Bavin, MacPherson, Denman, Crowley, & McDonald, 2020 and O'Mahony, 2020). This is particularly so for Lyd1: ' Its heartbreaking that yet more species are being released.…”

What is the main driver of unsustainable natural resource use in the Comoro Islands?

“…Q-methodology is a standard method used to reveal people's subjectivity and explore viewpoints on defined issues that are often contested (Stephenson, 1935). It specifically aims at identifying underlying patterns among stakeholders and comparing the key viewpoints, which leads to the identification of shared broad common points as well as divergences between them (Watts andStenner 2005, 2012;Bavin et al,2020;Arumugam et al, 2021). The approach combines the qualitative study of attitudes with the statistical rigors of quantitative research techniques (Watts andStenner, 2005, 2012;Bavin et al,2020;Arumugam et al, 2021).…”

Understanding Drivers of Unsustainable Natural Resource Use in the Comoro Islands

“…Q-methodology is a standard method used to reveal people's subjectivity and explore viewpoints on defined issues that are often contested (Stephenson, 1935). It specifically aims at identifying underlying patterns among stakeholders and comparing the key viewpoints, which leads to the identification of shared broad common points as well as divergences between them (Arumugam et al, 2021;Bavin et al, 2020;Watts & Stenner, 2005). The approach combines the qualitative study of attitudes with the statistical rigors of quantitative research techniques (Arumugam et al, 2021;Bavin et al, 2020;Watts & Stenner, 2005).…”

“…It specifically aims at identifying underlying patterns among stakeholders and comparing the key viewpoints, which leads to the identification of shared broad common points as well as divergences between them (Arumugam et al, 2021;Bavin et al, 2020;Watts & Stenner, 2005). The approach combines the qualitative study of attitudes with the statistical rigors of quantitative research techniques (Arumugam et al, 2021;Bavin et al, 2020;Watts & Stenner, 2005). It is increasingly applied in different types of environmental research, including environmental management and policy and social science of conservation (Arumugam et al, 2021;Debata et al, 2017;J.…”