2010
DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-8519-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Public Expenditure Tracking Surveys to Monitor Projects and Small-Scale Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are, however, very resource intensive to undertake and uncover a wider range of leakages than fraud and error. Indeed, PETS are estimated to cost at least $50,000 to $100,000 per project (Koziol and Tolmie, 2010;Reinekka and Smith, 2004).…”
Section: Public Expenditure Tracking Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are, however, very resource intensive to undertake and uncover a wider range of leakages than fraud and error. Indeed, PETS are estimated to cost at least $50,000 to $100,000 per project (Koziol and Tolmie, 2010;Reinekka and Smith, 2004).…”
Section: Public Expenditure Tracking Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Likewise, instead of relying on subjective assessments of corruption, public expenditure tracking surveys are now widely used to follow the flow of funds (Reinikka and Svensson 2003;Koziol and Tolmie 2010).…”
Section: Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educational fund mostly has been stolen or converted to other purpose by bureaucrats and politicians. According to Koziol and Tolmie (2010) PETS have been shown to be effective in identifying delays in financial and in-kind transfers, leakage rates, and general inefficiencies in public spending.…”
Section: Measuring the Efficiency Of Public Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%