2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2017.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using proton radiation from the moon to search for diurnal variation of regolith hydrogenation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If “albedo” protons were present in significant numbers, a mirror image band reflected about the 45° line in the scatter plot would be visible. Such protons are clearly seen (Schwadron et al, ) in analysis of D4·D6 coincidence data, for which the energy threshold is much lower, ∼65 MeV compared to ∼115 MeV. But here, no evidence of these protons is seen, likely because the large majority of them do not have sufficient kinetic energy to penetrate the stack and cause a threefold coincidence of the thick detectors.…”
Section: Previous Flux Results and Refinement Of Helium Identificatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If “albedo” protons were present in significant numbers, a mirror image band reflected about the 45° line in the scatter plot would be visible. Such protons are clearly seen (Schwadron et al, ) in analysis of D4·D6 coincidence data, for which the energy threshold is much lower, ∼65 MeV compared to ∼115 MeV. But here, no evidence of these protons is seen, likely because the large majority of them do not have sufficient kinetic energy to penetrate the stack and cause a threefold coincidence of the thick detectors.…”
Section: Previous Flux Results and Refinement Of Helium Identificatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, as noted in section 1, CRaTER does not see many “albedo” secondary particles coming up from the Moon that have enough energy to penetrate the stack and trigger all three thick detectors, which means that the ones we do detect give at most two energy‐deposit measurements and thus we have less information to devise cuts to separate, for example, the albedo proton track from its background. We have devised a method akin to the statistical procedure outlined above to perform background subtraction for these observations (Schwadron, Wilson, et al, 2018), and we plan to improve that algorithm and apply it to our measurements of lunar albedo protons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While all previous lunar mapping with CRaTER data used analysis that focused on albedo protons (Schwadron et al, 2016(Schwadron et al, , 2018Wilson et al, 2012Wilson et al, , 2014, we use here singles rates to derive the SEP Index and map the Moon. This means that we are probably seeing map features from more than one type of albedo particle.…”
Section: Candidate Albedo Particles In the Sepi Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(A similar method with a related limitation is used by the GOES team to identify SEP events in their data; they use a high event detection threshold due to the varying GCR background.) More recent work by Schwadron et al () used only ~500 hr of CRaTER data, so it could rely on the visual identification of three small SEP events to manually isolate periods where only the GCR background was present. This, however, is impractical for multiyear analysis and might suffer from a lack of consistency.…”
Section: Identifying Sep Events In Crater Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation