DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-11415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using programming protocols to investigate the effects of manipulative computer models on student learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of the simulation helped students concentrate only on computer memory operations, without other programming variables being involved. Hooper (1986) reported that students using the simulation employed more sophisticated algorithms during their programming than did students who were not exposed to the model.…”
Section: Experiencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the simulation helped students concentrate only on computer memory operations, without other programming variables being involved. Hooper (1986) reported that students using the simulation employed more sophisticated algorithms during their programming than did students who were not exposed to the model.…”
Section: Experiencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hooper (1986) reported that students using computer programming simulation employed more sophisticated algorithms during programming than did students who were not exposed to the manipulative computer model (MEMOPS) which was designed to facilitate the learning of programming. Thomas and Hooper (1991) reported that simulation may be useful for reinforcing complex sequences.…”
Section: Background Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…total number of runs, and number of correct solutions generated. This information has been termed a programming "protocol" and has been shown to be an effective method of evaluating student performance on programming problems (Hooper. 1986).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%