2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Product and Manufacturing System Platforms to Generate Producible Product Variants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas the research presented in this paper suggests rule-based assessments, simulation-based producibility assessments of product variants can be conducted using the CCM software (Landahl et al, 2016). Recent research also poses issues of production operation planning for product-production variety coordination using other production modeling software (Gong et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the research presented in this paper suggests rule-based assessments, simulation-based producibility assessments of product variants can be conducted using the CCM software (Landahl et al, 2016). Recent research also poses issues of production operation planning for product-production variety coordination using other production modeling software (Gong et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future, by leveraging a streamlined digital workflow for AM (Bonnard, Mognol & Hascoët 2010;Kim et al 2015) in combination with a product and manufacturing systems platform (Landahl et al 2016), we expect to significantly improve design and manufacturing efficiency for complex variants. The proposed technique may be cost-competitive as the printing time is shorter and material consumption is lower compared to solid 3D-printed tooling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of modelling perspectives, formats and frameworks were con-sidered for this task, notably the ArchiMate modelling language and the configurable component framework (CCF) [19]. CCF was selected for its integration of product and manufacturing system platforms in previous studies [9,10,20].…”
Section: Project 3: Modelling and Documenting Production Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For design of manufacturing systems utilising changeability (such as reconfigurable manufacturing), development and design of production platforms remains a challenge during the later design stages [6]. Concepts such as co-development [7], co-platforming [8] and, integrated product and production modelling [9,10] are gaining traction. This highlights a need for coexisting product and production platforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%