Using Preferred Outcome Distributions to Estimate Value and Probability Weighting Functions in Decisions under Risk

Abstract

In this paper we propose the use of preferred outcome distributions as a new method to elicit individuals' value and probability weighting functions in decisions under risk. Extant approaches for the elicitation of these two key ingredients of individuals' risk attitude typically rely on a long, chained sequence of lottery choices. In contrast, preferred outcome distributions can be elicited through an intuitive graphical interface, and, as we show, the information contained in two preferred outcome distributions is sufficient to identify non-parametrically both the value function and the probability weighting function in rank-dependent utility models. To illustrate our method and its advantages, we run an incentive-compatible lab study in which participants use a simple graphical interface -the Distribution Builder (Goldstein et al. 2008) -to construct their preferred outcome distributions, subject to a budget constraint. Results show that estimates of the value function are in line with previous research but that probability weighting biases are diminished, thus favoring our proposed approach based on preferred outcome distributions.

Learning to Cooperate: How First Impressions of Social Norms Shape Ethical Behavior

“…The distributions people provide can end up being more accurate than point estimates because they provide greater specificity across a range of possibilities. This approach has been used in a number of domains, including for estimating investor preferences (Sharpe, Goldstein, & Blythe, 2000); product quality (Yin & Schweitzer, 2022), personal choices (Johnson, Steffel, Goldstein, 2005), and risk (Donkers et al, 2013). We employed the distribution builder to better understand how people represent and update their inferences of social norms (see also Dimant, Gelfand, Hochleitner, & Sonderegger, 2022).…”

A target-oriented approach: a "one-size" model to suit humans and econs behaviors

“…The target-oriented decision-making model has been formally set up by Castagnoli and Li Calzi (1996) and subsequently extended by Bordley and Li Calzi (2000). To show how it can be applied in real problems we reword a decision example discussed by Goldstein et al (2008) and Donkers et al (2013). Suppose the agent is planning her risky investments she should commit to in view of saving for her retirement.…”