2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijmso.2016.081584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using preference-enriched faceted search for species identification

Abstract: Species identification is essentially a decision-making process comprising steps in which the user makes a selection of characters, figures or photographs, or provides an input, that restricts other choices, until reaching one species. In some identification methods such decisions should have a specific order. Consequently, a wrong decision at the beginning of the process, could exclude a big set of options. To make this process more flexible and less vulnerable to wrong decisions, in this paper we investigate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Faceted Browsing: Among the most popular approaches that have been studied for exploring knowledge graphs is that of faceted browsing, where users incrementally add restrictions -called facets -to restrict the current results [72]. Early works mainly focused on smaller, domain-specific graphs, among which we mention the mSpace system [68] in the multimedia domain, BrowseRDF [60] in the crime domain, /facet [43] and Ontogator [52] in the art domain, or more recently, ReVeaLD [48] in the biomedical domain, and Hippalus [71] in the zoology domain. Such works typically have dealt with smaller-scale and/or homogeneous graphs with few classes and properties, focusing on usability and expressivity rather than issues of scale or performance.…”
Section: Exploration Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faceted Browsing: Among the most popular approaches that have been studied for exploring knowledge graphs is that of faceted browsing, where users incrementally add restrictions -called facets -to restrict the current results [72]. Early works mainly focused on smaller, domain-specific graphs, among which we mention the mSpace system [68] in the multimedia domain, BrowseRDF [60] in the crime domain, /facet [43] and Ontogator [52] in the art domain, or more recently, ReVeaLD [48] in the biomedical domain, and Hippalus [71] in the zoology domain. Such works typically have dealt with smaller-scale and/or homogeneous graphs with few classes and properties, focusing on usability and expressivity rather than issues of scale or performance.…”
Section: Exploration Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%