2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2017.8190450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using practice architectures to investigate the invisibility of writing practices in the engineering curriculum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, engineering curricula do not often specifically target these skills (Pinelli et al, 1996). While several studies have been dedicated to understanding how technical written communication skills of engineering students may be improved, especially through lab reports (Hilgers et al, 1999;Goldsmith et al, 2019;Goldsmith, 2018;Wallwey et al, 2021), a cursory review of the available literature reveals a limited number of studies that focus on alternatives to lab reports and their effectiveness. The objectives of this article are to provide a brief survey of these studies, and to serve as a quick reference for those lab instructors who wish to diversify the form of lab assignments in their courses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, engineering curricula do not often specifically target these skills (Pinelli et al, 1996). While several studies have been dedicated to understanding how technical written communication skills of engineering students may be improved, especially through lab reports (Hilgers et al, 1999;Goldsmith et al, 2019;Goldsmith, 2018;Wallwey et al, 2021), a cursory review of the available literature reveals a limited number of studies that focus on alternatives to lab reports and their effectiveness. The objectives of this article are to provide a brief survey of these studies, and to serve as a quick reference for those lab instructors who wish to diversify the form of lab assignments in their courses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%