Using Positioning Theory to Study the Role of Emotions in Engineering Problem Solving: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Future Research

Abstract

Background: Engineering is often portrayed as a purely rational discipline, where emotions are considered irrelevant to problem solving. Also, in-depth research on emotions in engineering education is scarce, and most of the existing studies take their theoretical departure in individual and cognitivist perspectives. There is thus a need for emotion research from social interactionist perspectives-such as positioning theory. Purpose: This methodological paper aims to (1) develop an analytical framework for studying emotions through positioning theory and multimodal analysis, (2) illustrate its use in engineering education research, and (3) discuss methodological issues and offer recommendations for this type of research in engineering education. Method: To develop the analytical framework, we engaged with philosophical and empirical literature on positioning theory and emotions, as well as empirical data from a pilot study on engineering students' emotional positioning in individual, video-recorded interviews about a wicked sustainability problem. We illustrate the application of the framework and multimodal analysis using three extracts from that data. In line with positioning theory, the analysis focuses on how emotional moral orders are activated and negotiated. Three units of analysis are used: emotion acts, emotional storylines, and emotional positions. Results:The analysis shows how a dominant storyline of engineering as purely rational can be reconstructed, but also how a competing storyline of emotions as important for engineering can be constructed, sometimes simultaneously. These findings disrupt simplified narratives about engineers as unemotional and show that there are multiple ways of engaging with emotions in engineering problem solving. Conclusions: We conclude that positioning theory holds much potential for exploring a wide range of social interactional phenomena in engineering education. More research is needed to explore additional types, levels, and orders of emotional positioning to further nuance our understanding of the role of emotions in engineering education.

What does it mean to be “prepared for work”? Perceptions of new engineers

“…Second, the affective indications in our findings, coupled with studies such as Walther et al's (2011) work on accidental competencies and Lönngren's work on emotion (e.g., Lönngren, Adawi, & Berge, 2021; Lönngren, Bellocchi, et al, 2021), point to the need for further research on how affective factors impact students' preparation for and transition to work. What factors support or hinder participants' ability to apply existing skills to new contexts, or to learn new skills at work?…”

Public elementary school teachers’ positioning in teaching physical education to Japanese language learners

“…Positioning theory holds much potential for exploring a wide range of academic, social, and cross-cultural phenomena in teaching language learners in PE research. The potential for exploring Japanese teachers’ ethics is important and high, because positioning theory focuses analytical attention on values in PE between teachers, students, and parents (Lönngren et al, 2021). This study also sees potential for combining emotional positioning with the development of pedagogical strategies to enhance student learning in PE in the future.…”

Compassion and engineering students' moral reasoning: The emotional experience of engineering ethics cases

“…Engineering is often conceived as a highly rational and technocratic activity in which emotions are seen as irrelevant or even detrimental to good decision making (Cech, 2013;Kellam et al, 2018;Lönngren, Adawi, & Berge, 2021). Similarly, the dominant traditions in moral psychology have long focused on rational thinking in moral reasoning, rather than on emotions (Haidt, 2001(Haidt, , 2012.…”