2002
DOI: 10.1080/0261547022000015258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using portfolios to stimulate critical thinking in social work education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only five students did so. However, Heron (2006) has noted difficulties for students in offering critical analysis generally in their work on social work programmes while in this study the potential of portfolios to stimulate critical thinking appears to have not been fulfilled in the ways that Coleman et al (2002) might have expected. Slater (1996, p. 199) raised questions about the role of portfolios as vehicles to assess practice learning-it has been suggested that 'they seem to throw in everything but the kitchen sink'.…”
Section: Discussion Reflections and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only five students did so. However, Heron (2006) has noted difficulties for students in offering critical analysis generally in their work on social work programmes while in this study the potential of portfolios to stimulate critical thinking appears to have not been fulfilled in the ways that Coleman et al (2002) might have expected. Slater (1996, p. 199) raised questions about the role of portfolios as vehicles to assess practice learning-it has been suggested that 'they seem to throw in everything but the kitchen sink'.…”
Section: Discussion Reflections and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…12 and 15). In fact, portfolios are major assessment instruments used in the penultimate and final years of many social work programmes in the UK to test out and examine how students evidence competence and integrate theory with their work in practice settings (Slater, 1996;Taylor et al, 1999;Coleman et al, 2002). It is here the students encounter the demands of social work agencies and work with users in an organisational context where they have responsibilities for their professional practice, as well as academic work.…”
Section: The Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Despite values being spelled out for students in this way, they still seem to struggle with the application of both structural and emancipatory values. It has to be acknowledged that values, in particular, alongside critical, reflective thinking more generally, have long been thought important in social work education but, at the same time, are recognised to be difficult to teach (Coleman et al, 2002;Johnston, 2009). In acknowledging these challenges, Hugman (2005: 542) suggests that the task of social work education is to support students to develop a 'framework for thinking', one that tries to incorporate the three dimensions of values alongside reflective practice.…”
Section: The 'Problem' With Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 'portfolio route' was developed to provide flexibility for candidates (Graham and Megarry, 2005) so they could avail of support from their agency either through a structured group support programme or individual support from line managers or trainers. Discussion of the use of portfolios is omitted as it is well rehearsed elsewhere Maisch, 2007) particularly as assessment tools to develop critical and reflective thinking (Kolb, 1984;Taylor et al, 1999;Fisher and Somerton, 2000;Cartney, 2000;Coleman et al, 2002;Saltiel, 2003;Kroll, 2004) alongside verifiable evidence of competence.…”
Section: Assessment Of Competencementioning
confidence: 98%