2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-018-1050-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using population genetics and demographic reconstruction to predict outcomes of genetic rescue for an endangered songbird

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genetic diversity indices such as expected and observed heterozygosity ( H E and H O, respectively), number of alleles (Na), fixation index (F), diversity information index (I) to standardize diversity, unbiased expected heterozygosity ( uH E ) accounting for sample size, and Analyses of Molecular Variance (AMOVAs) were computed using genalex 6.5 (Peakall & Smouse, 2006). To test for differences in diversity metrics among sampling locations, we used a bootstrapping method that estimates measures of genetic diversity and accounts for influences of population size by resampling the data at different population sizes (Liu et al, 2015, 2018). We ran analyses with 1,000 replicates and considered sample sizes of 26, 27, and 28.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic diversity indices such as expected and observed heterozygosity ( H E and H O, respectively), number of alleles (Na), fixation index (F), diversity information index (I) to standardize diversity, unbiased expected heterozygosity ( uH E ) accounting for sample size, and Analyses of Molecular Variance (AMOVAs) were computed using genalex 6.5 (Peakall & Smouse, 2006). To test for differences in diversity metrics among sampling locations, we used a bootstrapping method that estimates measures of genetic diversity and accounts for influences of population size by resampling the data at different population sizes (Liu et al, 2015, 2018). We ran analyses with 1,000 replicates and considered sample sizes of 26, 27, and 28.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%