2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using physics to extend the range of machine learning models for an aerodynamic, hydraulic and combusting system: The toy model concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, Gregov [17] proposed a new approach for modeling and predictive analysis of the GEROLER hydraulic motor based on two types of multi-layer ANNs: static feed-forward and dynamic NARX. A toy model concept applicable to machine learning models, including neural networks, was proposed by Brahma [18]. Functional capabilities of the concept in the example of a hydraulic turbine efficiency prediction were presented.…”
Section: Neural Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, Gregov [17] proposed a new approach for modeling and predictive analysis of the GEROLER hydraulic motor based on two types of multi-layer ANNs: static feed-forward and dynamic NARX. A toy model concept applicable to machine learning models, including neural networks, was proposed by Brahma [18]. Functional capabilities of the concept in the example of a hydraulic turbine efficiency prediction were presented.…”
Section: Neural Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tan et al used extremum seeking and online optimization of engine model parameters to maximize IMEP [14]; an average error of 0.17 bar was achieved with this online-based strategy. The integration of other unique data-driven, empirical, and semi-empirical methods has also been explored in [15,16], where physics-based models were utilized to extend the range of machine learning predictions via the space transform. The method was effectively demonstrated for predictions of aerodynamic forces and hydraulic turbine efficiencies, as well as diesel engine calibration and combustion engine emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature demonstrates that leveraging physics to inform ANN models could enhance predictions of engine metrics and, as such, improve real-time combustion phasing control methods without the strict need for in-cylinder sensors. While prior work using either direct ANNs or integrated ANN and physics-based approaches to predict critical engine metrics has shown promise [1,[5][6][7]13,15,16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24], some challenges with uncertainty and complexity still need to be addressed. Some existing methods assume linear relationships and, as such, are simpler to use for control, but have a more limited ability to extrapolate, and encounter greater inaccuracy due to the nonlinearity of engine processes [7,13,18,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%