2006
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using peer-to-peer technology for collaborative knowledge management: concepts, frameworks and research issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…how to analyze a situation for risk) leads to multiple perspectives, which in turn increases understanding (e.g. Gupta and Bostrom, 2006;Paul, 2006;Tucker et al, 2007) and leads to learning (Fulmer et al, 1998;Hall and Paradice, 2005;Newell, 2004). A learning organization focusses not only on processes and procedures, but on obtaining new information and investigating where knowledge may be found when needed (Argyris and Schön, 1996;DiBella, 1995;Senge, 1990).…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…how to analyze a situation for risk) leads to multiple perspectives, which in turn increases understanding (e.g. Gupta and Bostrom, 2006;Paul, 2006;Tucker et al, 2007) and leads to learning (Fulmer et al, 1998;Hall and Paradice, 2005;Newell, 2004). A learning organization focusses not only on processes and procedures, but on obtaining new information and investigating where knowledge may be found when needed (Argyris and Schön, 1996;DiBella, 1995;Senge, 1990).…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research therefore it was considered appropriate to use the term CK, which is defined as efforts made between two entities (people, organisations, supply chains, etc.) and which takes place when a group of autonomous participants have a common problem and operate synergistically in a process to create and apply knowledge [19]. In this case, the term CK encompasses the idea of operating collectively and willingly to share knowledge, especially for the purpose of accomplishing a common goal both bi-directionally and reciprocally, and without the persuasive power of any participant who is in complete control.…”
Section: Ckm Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While influencing the motivation, the training helps the organizations inimprovingemployees' performancethrough enhancing skills, knowledge, and competence (Falola, Osibanjo, & Ojo, 2014). Finally,it improves organizational performances and productivity (Gupta & Bostrom, 2006).In addition, it engenders various other benefits such as higher employees' efficiencies, innovation, invention, capacity to accept new technologies and techniques, lower employee turnover andabsenteeism, etc.Training is used as an effective tool for improving job-related knowledge, skills, and attitudes (Armstrong & Taylor, 2017) thereby it changes the behaviours of the employees.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%