2013 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications and IEEE Internet of Things and IEEE Cyber, Physical A 2013
DOI: 10.1109/greencom-ithings-cpscom.2013.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Patterns of Social Dynamics in the Design of Social Networks of Sensors

Abstract: Sensor networks are gaining in importance in today's society; from air-pollution monitoring to forest-fire detection, from agriculture to battlefield communication, sensor networks are ubiquitous in many parts of the world. Furthermore, this is a world where sensors are increasingly integrated in smart phones and tablets. The use of this collection sensors as sensornetwork infrastructures (towards what we call Social Networks of Sensors", or SNoS) may be very fruitful and economically advantageous. However, it… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In CPSS, the physical sensors are generally fixed and static. The social sensors are affected by individual affective and physical state [25,26], which is a dynamic process. That is, these social sensors are carried by people and each social sensor moves among different locations based on the social dynamics.…”
Section: System Model and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In CPSS, the physical sensors are generally fixed and static. The social sensors are affected by individual affective and physical state [25,26], which is a dynamic process. That is, these social sensors are carried by people and each social sensor moves among different locations based on the social dynamics.…”
Section: System Model and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, these social sensors are carried by people and each social sensor moves among different locations based on the social dynamics. It should be noted that the concept of “location” has different definitions in the literature [25,26]. The authors of [25] utilized Voronoi diagram to divide the plane into cells and each Voronoi cell is referred to as a location.…”
Section: System Model and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We start with a representation of the environment. We envision a mix of mobile and fixed sensors in a metropolitan environment where people carry sensors forming a SNoS, but fixed sensors are attached to the city infrastructure [55]; Figure 1 depicts a city with fixed sensors (light, temperature and sound) coupled with people distributed in the city who assumed to carry smart devices with sensor capabilities. The city model consists of a square lattice of side( representing the metropolitan area) divided in square patches of one unit area (representing blocks); we have used this approach because it avoids us worrying about side-e↵ects to our results due to the geography of the city.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where γ and v are the minimum and maximum distances, respectively. This model is based on two mechanisms which describe the human mobility [10,12]:…”
Section: (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%