2006
DOI: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01798.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Participatory Action Research in a Community-Based Initiative Addressing Complex Mental Health Needs

Abstract: The emergent themes provide clues as to how complexity is constructed and interpreted across the system of involved agencies and interest groups. The implications these findings have for the development and evaluation of this community capacity-building project were examined from the perspective of constructing interventions that address both top-down and bottom-up processes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13][14][15] We suggest that the data presented here illustrate how far we presently are from capacity to provide integrated service responses to people with complex mental health problems in rural and regional Queensland.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…[13][14][15] We suggest that the data presented here illustrate how far we presently are from capacity to provide integrated service responses to people with complex mental health problems in rural and regional Queensland.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The collaborative reflection and validation process was based on participatory action research principles (e.g., Kemmis and McTaggart 2005;Knightbridge et al 2006). Volunteer participants were members of GROW WA's Program Team committee of seasoned GROW members and staffers set up to manage GROW activities in WA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an instrument, we chose the focus group because it provides numerous advantages: it promotes interaction, it offers direct information, it stimulates participation, it has a flexible and open nature, it presents the possibility to observe nonverbal components, and it favors intersubjectivity and reflexivity. For the design of focus groups, we followed the methodological recommendations of various authors [20][21][22][23][24]. The field notes and the in-depth observation regarding the study topic completed our methodological instruments, allowing for them to complete a "triangulation" among methods which verified or refuted the data of the focus groups [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was conducted in four health centers in different geographical places of Andalusia in the first quarter of 2017: two in urban environments, Granada and Seville, and two in rural environments, Palma del Río and Huércal-Overa, with the aim of achieving a socially-expansive representation. A fifth group was not organized because of information saturation [22][23][24]. The investigators had clinical experience in the follow-up of these individuals with BD, thus they selected the sample and included representative participants from each population.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%